Residency Selection in Otolaryngology: Past, Present, & Future

Abstract

ObjectivesTo examine the otolaryngology residency selection process, including past experiences based on the medical literature and survey analysis of our present practices to generate recommendations for future selection system design.MethodsA mixed‐methods study, including a scoping review and a cross‐sectional survey, was completed. Four databases were assessed for articles on otolaryngology residency selection published from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2020. A 36‐question survey was developed and distributed to 114 otolaryngology program directors. Descriptive and thematic analysis was performed.ResultsUltimately, 67 of 168 articles underwent data abstraction and assessment. Three themes surfaced during the analysis: effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. Regarding the survey, there were 62 participants (54.4% response rate). The three most important goals for the selection process were: (1) to fit the program culture, (2) to make good colleagues, and (3) to contribute to the program's diversity. The three biggest ‘pain points’ were as follows: (1) Large volume of applications, (2) Lack of reliable information about personal characteristics, and (3) Lack of reliable information about a genuine interest in the program.ConclusionsWithin this study, the depth and breadth of the literature on otolaryngology residency selection have been synthesized. Additionally, baseline data on selection practices within our specialty has been captured. With an informed understanding of our past and present, we can look to the future. Built upon the principles of person‐environment fit theory, our proposed framework can guide research and policy discussions regarding the design of selection systems in otolaryngology, as we work to achieve more effective, efficient, and equitable outcomes.Level of evidenceN/A Laryngoscope, 2023

Cost Analysis of High‐Signal Approach in Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Residency

“…Overapplication has many negative downstream effects 5 . Program directors are overwhelmed by applications, have difficulty discerning genuine interest from applicants, and overly weight imperfect screening metrics such as USMLE board scores 6 and medical school rankings. To keep up with the arms race, applicants face the financial and time consequences of applying to more and more programs each year with no improvement in the match rate 7 …”

Trends of Rising Research Production Among Otolaryngology Residency Applicants

“…Additional criteria or traits that can be employed to better differentiate between applicants using holistic review should be identified. 9 …”