Resident Accuracy in Performing Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma for Trauma: Not as Good as We Think We Are?

Soult, Alexa P.; Burgess, Jessica

doi:10.1177/000313481808400807

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…EFAST has a wide range of sensitivity and speci city [15,16]. Sensitivity and speci city were found to be lower in trainees [17]. A recent systematic review reported that the sensitivity of EFAST is generally lower than its speci city [18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Medical Students' Competency in EFAST Components: a prospective observational study

Farooq,

CEVIK,

ALAO

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Ultrasound training in undergraduate medical education is developing, and its incorporation in the curriculum requires careful planning. Extended Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma (EFAST) is commonly taught to medical students as one of the primary applications of ultrasound. Because false negative EFAST scans can affect patient clinical outcomes, it is essential to evaluate the individual components of this skill. We aim to determine which suboptimal EFAST components students perform after initial training. Methods In this prospective observational study, 90 medical students from two final-year cohorts were assessed in EFAST components after uniform training during the emergency medicine clerkship. All validated components of the standard EFAST exam were assessed. Descriptive analysis in individual components of EFAST was performed. Results The hepatorenal space, splenorenal space, and pelvic space fluid investigations had the lowest completion rates. Pericardial fluid, pelvic free fluid, and right thoracic pleural fluid investigations were most often incorrectly applied. Fanning was most commonly missed in hepatorenal, splenorenal, and pelvic free fluid investigations. Between 12% and 50% of EFAST components had omitted reporting. Conclusions There were significant numbers of incomplete assessments for free intraperitoneal fluid, mostly due to a lack of fanning in the hepatorenal, splenorenal, and pelvic areas. By targeting these challenging areas, trainers can effectively enhance student performance and outcomes. Further research might reveal whether residents and physicians show similar trends in EFAST completion.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%