Resident Perceptions of Black Bear Management in South Central Kentucky

Abstract

The growth and sprawl of the American black bear (Ursus americanus) population have been observed and monitored in the past two decades, especially in south-central Kentucky. To better manage human-black bear interaction and develop informed policy and best practices, the current study sought to 1) understand south-central Kentucky residents' current knowledge of and previous experience with black bears, 2) investigate residents' attitudes toward black bears and regulated hunting in wildlife management; and 3) identify residents' level of acceptance of various black bear related management actions in south-central Kentucky. From February to April 2017, residents of London and Stearns districts (southeastern regions) of the Daniel Boone National Forest, a black bear habitat, were invited to participate in this study. The results from 139 completed surveys showed that residents lacked sufficient knowledge about black bear populations in the region and received minimal information regarding black bear management efforts. In comparison to education efforts and relocation, regulated black bear hunting could be a cost-effective option to promote responsible use of wildlife resources and black bear population control. This study provided lessons and recommendations for black bear management in south-central Kentucky and may be of utilization for any other wildlife conservation areas.

Living with Bears in Prahova Valley, Romania: An Integrative Analysis

“…To evaluate personal protection measures to avoid bear encounters and degree of perceived risk in possible bear encounters, we used a 5-point Likert scale [16,90]: 1-very low risk, 2-low risk, 3-medium risk, 4-high risk, and 5-very high risk. All responses of the respondents highlighted the possible management measures and tolerance or inadmissibility of the bears in Prahova Valley.…”

“…The most predominant factor with direct influence on biodiversity loss is the urbanization process through oversizing human settlements, which causes habitat fragmentation and landscape change [13][14][15]. In contrast, the fragmentation of forests also contributes to biodiversity loss and the fragmentation of habitats occupied by wild fauna [16][17][18]. Specifically, the different interactions between humans and bears have increased alarmingly, with economic and sociocultural impacts on humans [19,20], as well as impacts on the ecology and feeding behavior of bears [21,22].…”