Resident perceptions of local offshore wind energy development: Modeling efforts to improve participatory processes

Adopting Multiactor Multicriteria Analysis for the Evaluation of Energy Scenarios

“…The scientific literature has already discussed active opposition to siting decisions, which is primarily expressed at the local level. For examples, see the works of Bell et al [16], Jobert et al [17] or more recent articles by Bertsch and Wolf [11], Guo et al [18] and Gonyo et al [19]. In this section, we address this issue in terms of energy scenarios and discuss approaches that decision makers could use to methodically engage with stakeholder groups in order to prevent active opposition and facilitate the acceptance of decisions.…”

Hubungan Sikap, Norma Subyektif Dan Persepsi Kendali Perilaku Terhadap Niat KTH Dalam Budidaya Tanaman Energi Di Yogyakarta

“…Sehubungan dengan kondisi tersebut, sebagai negara dengan luas hutan terbesar ketiga di dunia, Indonesia memiliki potensi yang sangat besar dalam menyediakan kebutuhan energi biomassa (Hendrati, 2020). Biomassa dari hutan tersebut dapat dikembangkan menjadi sumber EBT, yaitu berupa pelet kayu dan briket (Amirta, 2018;Mahdie et al, 2016;Hendra, 2012;Radam et al, 2018;) Meskipun demikian, para peneliti dari berbagai negara sepakat bahwa pengembangan energi alternatif yang berhasil tidak hanya ditentukan oleh ketersediaan sumberdaya bahan baku EBT, tetapi juga dukungan dan penerimaan (acceptance) masyarakat sekitar (i.e., Ball et al, 2021;Djurisic et al, 2020;Johansen, 2019;Soeiro & Ferreira Dias, 2020). Dari aspek bahan baku, dengan luas Hutan Rakyat 78.400 ha (DLHK, 2019) dan organisasi Kelompok Tani Hutan yang matang (Hardianti, Permadi, and Rohman 2020), tanaman pendukung sumber EBT potensial untuk dikembangkan di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY).…”

Engaged minority or quiet majority? Social intentions and actions related to offshore wind energy development in the United States

“…Therefore, further studies of intended social action are warranted. Relevant to offshore wind energy, Devine-Wright and Howes [26] and Gonyo et al [27] found that those with strong place attachment were more likely to engage in place-protective behaviors, such as active opposition. Gonyo et al [27] also found that support level, engagement in past action, and household distance to the shoreline were influential in the intent to engage in action either for or against offshore wind energy development in the Carolinas, specifically.…”

“…The goal of this study was to examine whether spatial variability of resident social action relative to the potential for offshore wind energy development would emerge from a given population. Building upon existing research [27], spatial clusters within coastal populations of North Carolina and South Carolina were identified using awareness, support level, and intended action. Perceived impacts, place attachment, and demographic characteristics were then compared between clusters to theorize why these differences may exist and how these findings can be used for potential improvement of offshore wind energy development processes.…”