1996
DOI: 10.3727/106527096792232388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resident Perceptions of Mega-Event Impacts: The Taejon International Exposition Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
48
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Among other factors, support from residents has been identified as being one key factor, which increases the probability of a positive benefit/cost ratio for a mega event and, hence, to indirectly influence the social and tourism impact from the event (Deccio & Baloglu, 2002;Hiller & Wanner 2011;Jeong and Faulkner 1996;Pappas, 2014;Ritchie, Shipway & Cleeve, 2009;Zhou & Ap, 2009 (from a host`s point of view), ex-post support seems of secondary importance, with the argument that the necessary investment has been already made (Soutar & McLeod, 1993).…”
Section: Social Exchange Theory and Domestic Support For Mega Sports mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among other factors, support from residents has been identified as being one key factor, which increases the probability of a positive benefit/cost ratio for a mega event and, hence, to indirectly influence the social and tourism impact from the event (Deccio & Baloglu, 2002;Hiller & Wanner 2011;Jeong and Faulkner 1996;Pappas, 2014;Ritchie, Shipway & Cleeve, 2009;Zhou & Ap, 2009 (from a host`s point of view), ex-post support seems of secondary importance, with the argument that the necessary investment has been already made (Soutar & McLeod, 1993).…”
Section: Social Exchange Theory and Domestic Support For Mega Sports mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, they have to face monetary (increased or diversion of taxes) and non-monetary negative external and internal effects such as noise, traffic, pollution, frustration, anger about politics (Müller, 2015;Preuss & Solberg 2006). Referring to social exchange theory (Homans, 1958) and rational behaviour of local residents, the balance of positive and negative effects may determine his/her support for MSEs; such support has been identified as a main factor influencing the benefit/cost ratio and the social impact of these events (Deccio & Baloglu, 2002;Hiller & Wanner 2011;Jeong and Faulkner 1996;Pappas, 2014;Ritchie, Shipway & Cleeve, 2009;Zhou & Ap, 2009). At the pre-event stage especially, it is important to maximize acceptance of the event among local residents, in order to better promote and justify the event to key policy makers, sponsors and the non-city population and to increase the efficiency of event management during the preparation and bidding period (Coates & Wicker, 2015;Ma, Egan, Rotherham & Ma, 2011;Ritchie et al, 2009;Roche, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prospect of hosting a successful mega-event and the positive spin-offs and opportunities that this might create through international publicity and recognition (Jeong and Faulkner, 1996) often cause potential host communities to ignore any negative impacts that might occur (Kim et al, 2006).…”
Section: Literature In Briefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, festivals are travel attractions with unique features (Gursoy, Kim & Uysal, 2004). Many studies related to festivals focus on: host community reactions (Fredline, Faulkner, 2000), hallmark and major events (Lee, 2000), economic impacts (Crompton, Lee & Shuster, 2001), resident`s attitudes and perceptions (Jeong, Faulkner, 1996) and the percived crowding of a festival experience (Lee, Graefe, 2003). However, there are very few papers exploring the issue of cultural assets as venues of the festivals (Besermenji et al, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%