2021
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyab068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residential exposure to traffic-borne pollution as a risk factor for acute cardiocerebrovascular events: a population-based retrospective cohort study in a highly urbanized area

Abstract: Background Long-term exposure to traffic-borne noise and air pollution has been variably associated with incidence of acute vascular events, namely acute myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke and haemorrhagic stroke. This study aims at exploring this association within a highly urbanized city. Methods This is a population-based retrospective dynamic cohort study including all residents aged ≥ 35 years in the municipality of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…STEMI-SCAD is an important subset of STEMI, particularly among younger women, and generally brings a significantly higher frequency of left main or LAD culprit and cardiogenic shock compared to STEMI atherosclerosis [ 22 ]. Long-term exposure to air pollution and traffic noise has also been variably associated with the incidence of acute vascular events, including AMI [ 23 ]. Notably, in this case, emergency service workers did not suspect AMI, despite the symptoms, due to the young age of the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STEMI-SCAD is an important subset of STEMI, particularly among younger women, and generally brings a significantly higher frequency of left main or LAD culprit and cardiogenic shock compared to STEMI atherosclerosis [ 22 ]. Long-term exposure to air pollution and traffic noise has also been variably associated with the incidence of acute vascular events, including AMI [ 23 ]. Notably, in this case, emergency service workers did not suspect AMI, despite the symptoms, due to the young age of the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excluding one conference report, the overall RR per 10 dB L den was 1.03 (95 % CI: 1.00; 1.05), with significant heterogeneity between the studies. More recent findings, not included in the two reviews, also indicated lower risk estimates than in the WHO review or no clear associations [ [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] , [58] ]. All but one of these studies were strictly registry-based and did not contain any information on lifestyle, e.g., smoking, increasing the risk of residual lifestyle confounding compared to the studies in the two reviews, which generally included such data.…”
Section: Health Impact Of Transportation Noisementioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, it should be noted that simplified noise exposure assessment approaches were applied in the studies which found no association. In studies with less complete confounder adjustment, two studies reported an association with stroke [ 56 , 78 ], whereas three other studies did not [ 54 , 58 , 79 ].…”
Section: Health Impact Of Transportation Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noise coming from external sources is not perceived as significant since the noise generated by internal sources in the classroom often makes the disturbance caused by external sources negligible, or at least little perceived, during regular teaching activities. However, considering the literature evidence, which suggests that noise pollution from vehicular and air traffic or from industrial areas is able to determine or aggravate important pathologies such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, sleep disturbances and annoyance, the acoustic climate inside schools, noise attributable to sources outside the building should be excluded as much as possible by evaluating the acoustic performance of the facade, especially when the school building is located in particularly busy areas (motorway junctions, railway stations, industrial areas) [7]. In most cases, the noise coming from outside is not considered disturbing, but this does not mean that it cannot contribute to triggering stress mechanisms that can result in cardiovascular or endocrine diseases.…”
Section: The Link Between Acoutistic Climate and Neurobehavioral Alte...mentioning
confidence: 99%