Residential mobility in East and West Germany: mobility rates, mobility reasons, reurbanization

Abstract

Before unifi cation, the processes of residential mobility in East and West Germany were very different, and remarkable variations in mobility still persisted until the mid 1990s. Following a wave of residential suburbanization and of heavy residential construction, as well as refurbishments in the new Länder during the second half of the 1990s, mobility rates strongly increased in East Germany. After 2000, both parts of the united country seem to be characterized by a new process of regional redistribution of the population in favour of core cities leading to reurbanization. Therefore, it could be expected that there was an adjustment of mobility processes in the East in line with corresponding Western processes, and that former East-West differences are no longer relevant. This fi rst general hypothesis is investigated for indicators of mobility rates, reasons for mobility and the attractiveness of urban forms of housing and neighbourhoods. A second hypothesis refers to path dependencies in recent mobility processes. Some differences in residential mobility can still be expected to result from past and current differences in housing stock and housing construction. These research questions are tested using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP). The results show that former differences in mobility rates disappeared during the late 1990s, and that it was possible to observe tendencies towards convergence for motivational structures. Similar results were obtained for a recent trend of reurbanization because a shift towards more urban forms of housing and neighbourhoods can be observed in both East and West Germany. Nevertheless, even if the average patterns are similar, regional and socio-economic disparities seem to be wider in East Germany. Mobility rates according to settlement structure are therefore much more pronounced, and the infl uence of income on residential mobility, is higher in the new Länder. Wohnmobilität in Ost-und Westdeutschland: Mobilitätsraten, Mobilitätsgründe, ReurbanisierungZusammenfassung: Die Prozesse der Wohnmobilität verliefen in Ost-und Westdeutschland vor der Vereinigung sehr verschiedenartig, und bis Mitte der 1990er Jahre waren noch erhebliche Unterschiede zwischen beiden Teilgebieten festzustellen. In der zweiten Hälfte der 90er Jahre kam es dann aufgrund einer Welle der Wohnsuburbanisierung und von hoher Neubautätigkeit sowie von Renovierungen in den neuen Ländern zu einem starken Anstieg der Mobilitätsraten. Nach 2000 scheinen beide Landesteile durch einen neuen Prozess der regionalen Umverteilung der Bevölkerung zugunsten der Kernstädte bestimmt zu sein, der als Reurbanisierung bezeichnet wird. Es könnte daher erwartet werden, dass es eine Anpassung der Mobilitätsprozesse im Osten an die entsprechenden Prozesse im Westen gegeben hat und dass ehemalige Ost-West-Unterschiede keine Bedeutung mehr haben. Diese erste allgemeine Hypothese wird untersucht anhand von Indikatoren der Mobilitätsraten, der Wanderungsgründe und der Attraktivität von städ-tischen Formen des Wohnens...

Staunching Emigration from East Germany: Age and the Determinants of Migration

“…The labor unions justified their policy in part on the grounds that wage increases would keep skilled workers in the east, which would be beneficial for the eastern economy. 1 Economists suggested instead that the large wage rises would provoke high unemployment, which in turn would encourage emigration. 2 In this paper I focus on the period following monetary union, when emigration was primarily determined by economic factors, and assess whether the rising wage (a pull factor) or rising unemployment (a push factor) was more influential.…”

Housing Expenditures and Income Inequality

“…As Figure C1 shows, both high-skilled and low-skilled individuals are more likely to live in large cities than medium-skilled individuals, and the increase over time is higher for both high-and low-skilled. 25 These findings relate to the analysis by Kemper (2009) who characterizes the late 1990s as a period of "suburbanization" followed by a period of "reurbanization" during the 2000s. However, he doesn't distinguish between different income groups.…”

Traces of Social Sustainability in Garden Cities- Karlsruhe as a Case Study

“…The same study reveals that people living in the cities are more likely to change places than the ones in rural areas. Kemper (2008) analyzes the type of destination dwellings to which the inhabitants move. The results show that the highest share in West Germany corresponds the residential buildings with 5-8 apartments and the least favorable is the terraced house.…”