Residential Segregation, Health, and Health Care: Answering the Latino Question

Anderson, Kathryn Freeman; Fullerton, Andrew S.

doi:10.1007/s12552-014-9125-2

Cited by 25 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 69 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Following previous lit, we dichotomized responses into ‘good’, ‘very good’ or ‘excellent’ (hereafter, ‘good SRH’) versus ‘fair’ or ‘poor’ (Anderson, Fullerton 2014, Chen, Yang 2014). …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Current tobacco smoking and non-occupation related physical activity within the previous 30 days were categorized as ‘yes’/’no’ following previous literature (Bratter, Gorman 2011, Anderson, Fullerton 2014). …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…residents of Latino ethnicity have lower self-rated general health (SRH) compared to U.S. residents of non-Latino ethnicity, even after adjustment for numerous factors (Anderson, Fullerton 2014, McGee et al 1999, Shetterly et al 1996). This is an important health disparity as SRH is a consistent predictor of mortality (DeSalvo et al 2006, Idler, Benyamini 1997).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A growing body of research has investigated whether residential ethnic composition – Latino density (percent of residents identifying as Latino) and Latino segregation (variation of where Latinos reside within an area) (Massey, Denton 1988, James, Taeuber 1985) – contributes to SRH disparities by ethnicity (Rios, Aiken & Zautra 2012, Anderson, Fullerton 2014, Nelson 2013, Patel et al 2003, Shaw, Pickett 2011). Higher Latino density and segregation have been associated with adverse mental health (Rios, Aiken & Zautra 2012, Hong, Zhang & Walton 2014), health care access (Gaskin et al 2012, Dinwiddie et al 2013), food access (Powell et al 2007), and physical activity facilities and outcomes (Osypuk et al 2009) – factors that have been associated with worse SRH among Latinos (Anderson, Fullerton 2014, Nelson 2013, Patel et al 2003). However, higher Latino density, but not segregation, has also been associated with better health behaviors and outcomes (Osypuk et al 2009, Bécares 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Similarly, studies of SRH among Latinos are mixed with two indicating that SRH declines with higher Latino density (Rios, Aiken & Zautra 2012) or segregation (Anderson, Fullerton 2014) and one finding that SRH improves with higher Latino density (Patel et al 2003). Additionally, studies have reported that gender or ethnic subgroup moderate the relationship between SRH and Latino density (Shaw, Pickett 2011) or segregation (Nelson 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Latino residential segregation and self-rated health among Latinos: Washington State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012–2014

Plascak

Molina

Wu-Georges

et al. 2016

Social Science & Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The relationship between Latino residential segregation and self-rated health (SRH) is unclear, but might be partially affected by social capital. We investigated the association between Latino residential segregation and SRH while also examining the roles of various social capital measures. Washington State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2012–2014) and U.S. Census data were linked by zip code and zip code tabulation area. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to estimate odds of good or better SRH by Latino residential segregation, measured by the Gini coefficient, and controlling for sociodemographic, acculturation and social capital measures of neighborhood ties, collective socialization of children, and social control. The Latino residential segregation – SRH relationship was convex, or ‘U’-shaped, such that increases in segregation among Latinos residing in lower segregation areas was associated with lower SRH while increases in segregation among Latinos residing in higher segregation areas was associated with higher SRH. The social capital measures were independently associated with SRH but had little effect on the relationship between Latino residential segregation and SRH. A convex relationship between Latino residential segregation and SRH could explain mixed findings of previous studies. Although important for SRH, social capital measures of neighborhood ties, collective socialization of children, and social control might not account for the relationship between Latino residential segregation and SRH.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Latino residential segregation and self-rated health among Latinos: Washington State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012–2014

Plascak

Molina

Wu-Georges

et al. 2016

Social Science & Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Psychological Cost of Racial Discrimination: What is the Role of Residential Segregation?

Woo

Fan

Tran

et al. 2019

American J of Comm Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Racial discrimination is known to harm health, but to what extent the health burden of racial discrimination is contingent on residential contexts is understudied. This study examines the moderating role of racial residential segregation in the relationship between racial discrimination and psychological distress. Nationally representative data from the 2002–2003 National Latino and Asian American Study were merged with metropolitan‐level data from the U.S. Census. Logistic regression models were used to test the independent and joint contributions of racial discrimination and residential segregation to psychological distress among Asians and Latinxs, stratified by nativity status. Higher residential segregation (measured by the interaction index) is associated with lower odds of distress among U.S.‐born Asians but not among other groups. As for the moderating effect, residential segregation exacerbates the positive association between discrimination and distress among foreign‐born Asians (measured by the dissimilarity index) and foreign‐born Latinxs (measured by the interaction index), but not among their respective U.S.‐born counterparts. Taken together, the present study highlights that strategies to mitigate the psychological burden of racial discrimination need to move beyond individual‐level efforts to incorporate neighborhood‐based approaches. In particular, results provide empirical support for efforts to reduce residential segregation, particularly among immigrants who are discriminated against.

show abstract

Three Ecologies of the Urban Environment and the Health of Latinx Communities

Lara‐Valencia

García-Pérez

2019

New and Emerging Issues in Latinx Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Residential Segregation, Health, and Health Care: Answering the Latino Question

Cited by 25 publications

References 69 publications

Latino residential segregation and self-rated health among Latinos: Washington State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012–2014

Latino residential segregation and self-rated health among Latinos: Washington State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012–2014

The Psychological Cost of Racial Discrimination: What is the Role of Residential Segregation?

Three Ecologies of the Urban Environment and the Health of Latinx Communities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About