2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residents’ perceptions and attitudes toward waste treatment facility sites and their possible conversion: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…incineration, ammonia production and reductant production is realized by disposing most of recovered plastic waste in a landfill (Figure 1). Given that the construction of a landfill site is a controversial issue in China with local people opposing new construction (Che et al, 2013, Zhang andKlenosky, 2016), this scenario appears to be neither realistic nor sustainable.…”
Section: Optimization Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…incineration, ammonia production and reductant production is realized by disposing most of recovered plastic waste in a landfill (Figure 1). Given that the construction of a landfill site is a controversial issue in China with local people opposing new construction (Che et al, 2013, Zhang andKlenosky, 2016), this scenario appears to be neither realistic nor sustainable.…”
Section: Optimization Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the recognised methods on social, recreational and natural functioning of informal green spaces, there is a lack of evaluation methods on former urban landfills [1,6,24,26,28]. Therefore, to evaluate degraded areas functioning as informal green spaces, there is a need to develop methods that can evaluate various open spaces and public areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This universal analytical framework is related to (1) welcoming place (physical access and provision of signage and information); (2) healthy, safe and secure (facilities and opportunities offered for exercise, as well as general safety and security); (3) clean The research methodology of the paper is presented in Figure 4. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]13,15,16,[24][25][26][27][28][29]32,33,[38][39][40]; 3b-literature query for informal urban green spaces [2,[10][11][12]14]; 3c-collection of input materials concerning the study area [1,6,26,27,34,35,46]; 3d-determination of research method/research analytical framework; 3e-development of an evaluation questionnaire form for case study (Appendix A: Figure A1); 4-field studies; 4a-photographic documentation of the study site; 4b-distribution of an evaluation questionnaire form sheets among the site visitors (online forms, written notice posted on the surveyed sites); 5-collection and compilation of the study site evaluation statistics; 6-elaboration of results; 7-discussion of results; 8-conclusions, guidelines and summary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Determining residents′ preferences for regeneration alternatives is of great importance for this process (Glumac, Han, & Schaefer, 2015;Haase, Wolff, & Rink, 2018). Opinions of residents or visitors, with the exception of brownfield development into recreational grounds (Zhang & Klenosky, 2016), is mentioned rather sparsely in brownfield redevelopment literature.…”
Section: Spatial Factors Influencing Attitudes Of Residents Towards Bmentioning
confidence: 99%