2017
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual brain injury after early discontinuation of cooling therapy in mild neonatal encephalopathy

Abstract: We examined the brain injury and neurodevelopmental outcomes in a prospective cohort of 10 babies with mild encephalopathy who had early cessation of cooling therapy. All babies had MRI and spectroscopy within 2 weeks after birth and neurodevelopmental assessment at 2 years. Cooling was prematurely discontinued at a median age of 9 hours (IQR 5–13) due to rapid clinical improvement. Five (50%) had injury on MRI or spectroscopy, and two (20%) had an abnormal neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years. Premature cess… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, a recent report highlighted that some centers are treating neonates with mild encephalopathy but discontinuing cooling before completion of 72 hours of hypothermia; more than 50% of these neonates had injury on MRI and 20% had developmental delays including language delay. 32 Others have suggested that the presence of clinical encephalopathy (including mild) and changes in neurophysiology (EEG) and not acidosis alone are associated with injury on MRI and with adverse outcomes in the neonatal period and beyond. 9,30,33 Skranes et al noted neonates with abnormal initial (at onset of cooling) amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) background were at risk of more MR injury and worse cognitive outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, a recent report highlighted that some centers are treating neonates with mild encephalopathy but discontinuing cooling before completion of 72 hours of hypothermia; more than 50% of these neonates had injury on MRI and 20% had developmental delays including language delay. 32 Others have suggested that the presence of clinical encephalopathy (including mild) and changes in neurophysiology (EEG) and not acidosis alone are associated with injury on MRI and with adverse outcomes in the neonatal period and beyond. 9,30,33 Skranes et al noted neonates with abnormal initial (at onset of cooling) amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) background were at risk of more MR injury and worse cognitive outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the numbers were small, our study suggests that cooling for less than 24 hours is unlikely to be beneficial in mild HIE, as there was no difference in the metabolite profile of non-cooled and partially cooled babies. We previously demonstrated that there was MRI evidence of residual brain injury in 50% of the babies with mild HIE who were cooled for less than 24 hours, and 20% of them subsequently had adverse outcomes 20. Whether cooling for 24 or 48 hours is as good or better than cooling for 72 hours in mild HIE is not known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no established prognostic method by which clinicians can determine if it is possible to stop cooling before 72 hours [63], and so hypothermia should be continued for 3 days. Supporting this concept, in one case series of 10 infants with mild HIE in whom hypothermia was stopped early because of rapid clinical improvement, neural injury on magnetic resonance imaging was seen in half and disability at 2 years of age in 2 infants [64]. Given that there are roughly as many infants with mild HIE as there are with moderate to severe HIE, it is critical that the benefits of treatment for this group should be formally tested.…”
Section: Other Populations: Should We Cool Infants With Mild Hie?mentioning
confidence: 99%