2004
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2004.0442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual Effects of Manure and Compost Applications on Corn Production and Soil Properties

Abstract: Residual effects of manure or compost application can maintain crop yield level for several years after Residual effects of manure or compost application on crop production and soil properties can last for several years. This study was manure or compost application ceases since only a fracconducted to evaluate residual effects of annual or biennial application of the N and other nutrients in manure or compost tions of N-and P-based composted and noncomposted beef cattle become plant available in the first year… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
88
2
15

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
25
88
2
15
Order By: Relevance
“…This loss may be partially offset by enhanced decomposition during the anaerobic digestion process, which could increase the available nutrient content in SS, thus supporting our result that SS-amended soils yielded similar crop responses to CM-amended soils. For Year 5, without amendment application, the significant differences among treatments demonstrated the residual effect of the previous four annual ap- -harvest soil NH 4 -N and NO 3 -N at the 0-to 15-, 15-to 30-, and 30-to 60-cm depths and Olsen-P at the 0-to 15-cm depth in response to solid cattle manure (CM), anaerobically digested cattle manure (ADM) and separated solids after liquid fraction removal from ADM (SS) applied annually at 200 and 400 kg total N ha −1 rates (1 and 2) for 4 yr. plications, which is consistent with the residual effect of organic amendments in other studies (Eghball et al, 2004;Gutser et al, 2005;Lentz and Lehrsch, 2012) but is also a reflection of depleted plant-available nutrients in the control soil after 5 yr without an external fertilizer source. The annual forage yields in our study (4-11 Mg ha −1 ) were comparable to the range (7-13 Mg ha −1 ) reported for barley in this region (Hargreaves et al, 2009), apart from the low yield obtained in 2011.…”
Section: Barley Forage Responsesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This loss may be partially offset by enhanced decomposition during the anaerobic digestion process, which could increase the available nutrient content in SS, thus supporting our result that SS-amended soils yielded similar crop responses to CM-amended soils. For Year 5, without amendment application, the significant differences among treatments demonstrated the residual effect of the previous four annual ap- -harvest soil NH 4 -N and NO 3 -N at the 0-to 15-, 15-to 30-, and 30-to 60-cm depths and Olsen-P at the 0-to 15-cm depth in response to solid cattle manure (CM), anaerobically digested cattle manure (ADM) and separated solids after liquid fraction removal from ADM (SS) applied annually at 200 and 400 kg total N ha −1 rates (1 and 2) for 4 yr. plications, which is consistent with the residual effect of organic amendments in other studies (Eghball et al, 2004;Gutser et al, 2005;Lentz and Lehrsch, 2012) but is also a reflection of depleted plant-available nutrients in the control soil after 5 yr without an external fertilizer source. The annual forage yields in our study (4-11 Mg ha −1 ) were comparable to the range (7-13 Mg ha −1 ) reported for barley in this region (Hargreaves et al, 2009), apart from the low yield obtained in 2011.…”
Section: Barley Forage Responsesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Numbers followed by the same letters within a column do not differ at the 0.05 level of significance. The combined use of PL and CM with inorganic fertilizer resulted in a similar DM yield to INORG treatment, perhaps due to the residual and soil amelioration effects of these materials as reported by different authors (Eghball et al, 2004;Adeli et al, 2007;Hirzel et al, 2007a). Yield potential of crops is not only associated with nutrient uptake but also uptake efficiency from improved physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil (Singer et al, 2004;Adeli et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The residual effects of manure application from the first cultivation and the decayed maize crop residue could be responsible. This was in agreement with the works of Isitekhale et al (2013) for tomato, Eghball et al (2004) and Farhad et al (2011) for maize that gave highest plant height in soils treated with poultry compost. The long-lasting effect exhibited by the added compost could be responsible; while least values were recorded in plots without amendment.…”
Section: Growth Measurement Of Maizesupporting
confidence: 92%