2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual Expression of Reprogramming Factors Affects the Transcriptional Program and Epigenetic Signatures of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Abstract: Delivery of the transcription factors Oct4, Klf4, Sox2 and c-Myc via integrating viral vectors has been widely employed to generate induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines from both normal and disease-specific somatic tissues, providing an invaluable resource for medical research and drug development. Residual reprogramming transgene expression from integrated viruses nevertheless alters the biological properties of iPSCs and has been associated with a reduced developmental competence both in vivo and in vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, similar to our findings, the choice of the promoter system for driving transgene expression is known to affect the transcriptional program and epigenetic signature in iPSCs (Sommer et al, 2012). iPSC clones that lost their transgene expression, were remarkably more similar to their native counterparts (ESCs), whereas others that contained a continuous expression of transgenes prevented them from acquiring the native transcriptional profile (Sommer et al, 2012).…”
Section: Fig 6 Scaffolds Seeded With Ichonsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Indeed, similar to our findings, the choice of the promoter system for driving transgene expression is known to affect the transcriptional program and epigenetic signature in iPSCs (Sommer et al, 2012). iPSC clones that lost their transgene expression, were remarkably more similar to their native counterparts (ESCs), whereas others that contained a continuous expression of transgenes prevented them from acquiring the native transcriptional profile (Sommer et al, 2012).…”
Section: Fig 6 Scaffolds Seeded With Ichonsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Indeed, differentiation potential depends on the hiPS cells used [102] , and there are differences between hiPS cell populations in the efficiency of differentiation to hepatocytes, as evidenced by differences in albumin expression levels [103] . The reprogramming factors themselves affect the differentiation of iPS cells to specific cell fates [104] . Although the results originate from mouse iPS cells, there are differences in the methylation sites between iPS cells reprogrammed with different factors.…”
Section: I M I T a T I O N S A S S O C I A T E D W I T H Hepatocytementioning
confidence: 99%
“…37,40,41 In other studies where reprogramming is performed in the absence of transgenes, no transcriptomic differences were identified in cells that were reprogrammed with or without c-myc. 42 Of particular interest is the finding that among more than 2,000 genes that exhibited significant differential expression when the transgene is absent (most of them related to epigenetic regulation and chromatin assembly), the housekeeping PMCA isoforms were expressed. Furthermore, PMCA4 appeared to be overexpressed, while PMCA1 was underexpressed.…”
Section: Stem Cells As a Tool For Studying Embryonic Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, PMCA4 appeared to be overexpressed, while PMCA1 was underexpressed. 42 Although the meaning of these results is not readily apparent, they may be understood in terms of the unique features of each isoform associated to the specific demands that the microenvironment might impose.…”
Section: Stem Cells As a Tool For Studying Embryonic Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%