2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.07.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual olfactory dysfunction in coronavirus disease 2019 patients after long term recovery

Abstract: Introduction Hyposmia is among the most common symptoms of COVID-19 patients. Previous research has mainly described this issue at the disease’s early stages. Because olfactory impairment can indicate neurological degeneration, we investigated the possibility of permanent olfactory damage by assessing hyposmia during the late recovery stage of COVID-19 patients. Methods Ninety-five patients were assessed with the Brief Smell Identification Test for Chinese (B-SITC) and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
6
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of patients (82.6%) showed an altered smell function in the UPSIT test, a considerably higher proportion than the 41.1% found in [ 55 ]. Other groups that quantified the smell through different olfactometry tests, such as the Sniffin’ Sticks test and the Brief Smell Identification test, showed rates for hyposmia from 25.4% to 72.5% [ 23 , 56 ] and 76% [ 57 ], respectively, compared with the 75.3% obtained in our study. The prevalence of anosmia in our study (7.2%) ( Table 9 ) was also higher than rates previously published between 0% and 4% [ 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority of patients (82.6%) showed an altered smell function in the UPSIT test, a considerably higher proportion than the 41.1% found in [ 55 ]. Other groups that quantified the smell through different olfactometry tests, such as the Sniffin’ Sticks test and the Brief Smell Identification test, showed rates for hyposmia from 25.4% to 72.5% [ 23 , 56 ] and 76% [ 57 ], respectively, compared with the 75.3% obtained in our study. The prevalence of anosmia in our study (7.2%) ( Table 9 ) was also higher than rates previously published between 0% and 4% [ 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…Another limitation of our study may be due to the appearance or worsening of chemosensory dysfunction caused by other (non-controlled) upper respiratory tract infections during the follow-up period. Although this confusion factor could have led to a selection bias, we should highlight that the protection and isolation measures used for respiratory tract infections during the pandemic helped prevent infections from all respiratory viruses [ 57 , 61 ], and consequently, we can claim that the long-lasting chemosensory impairment seen in our study at the 12-month follow-up may be mostly attributed to the primary SARS-CoV-2 infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Then, SARS-CoV-2 via the olfactory nerve can spread to the olfactory bulb (Desforges et al, 2019 ; Beltrán-Corbellini et al, 2020 ). Clinicians should be alert regarding olfactory disorders which may mark the onset of some neurodegenerative diseases (Zhu et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of hyposmia, the proportion reported in this work is much higher than that reported in similar studies. About 32% of hyposmia conditions are declared in Chinese patients when assessed objectively three months after hospitalization [ 33 ]. An Israelian study assessed post-COVID-19 hyposmia among 112 patients between 6 weeks to 6 months after symptoms proclaimed 15% smell change [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%