2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(02)00134-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual strength analyses of stiffened and unstiffened panels––Part II: wide panels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A, Measured and predicted crack extension in flat stiffened panel with a single lead crack . B, Measured and predicted crack extension in flat stiffened panel with a lead crack and MSD cracks…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A, Measured and predicted crack extension in flat stiffened panel with a single lead crack . B, Measured and predicted crack extension in flat stiffened panel with a lead crack and MSD cracks…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[115][116][117][118]), applications of the cohesive model, frequently combined with investigations of the CTOA concept are found in [71] in this issue and elsewhere (e.g. [74,113,114,119]).…”
Section: Application Of the Ctoa Cohesive Zone And Damage Model Apprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a significant amount of scatter (±1 deg) is always present in the experimental measurements. 8,12,19,20,25 Numerical simulation of test specimens is usually used to determine a critical CTOA value that fits the residual strength and crack growth observed in testing. 8,[11][12][13]21,25,26 Such finite element simulations usually result in estimated CTOA values different than the experimentally measured values but within the scatter band.…”
Section: Critical Ctoa (ψ C ) Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,12,19,20,25 Numerical simulation of test specimens is usually used to determine a critical CTOA value that fits the residual strength and crack growth observed in testing. 8,[11][12][13]21,25,26 Such finite element simulations usually result in estimated CTOA values different than the experimentally measured values but within the scatter band. 8,11,12 Sutton et al 20 reported an experimentally measured value of c = 4.7 deg for 2024-T3 aluminum in the T-L grain direction.…”
Section: Critical Ctoa (ψ C ) Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation