2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual stress assessment of nickel-based alloy 690 welding parts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before the crack growth analyses of the CT specimen for ER316L, WRS simulation of a welding block was preceded. The temperature‐dependent thermal and mechanical properties of the TP316 base metal and ER316L weld metal used in this study were retrieved from previous studies and materials specification sheets of the manufacturers. In order to simulate material hardening behaviour, from the conservative engineering viewpoint, isotropic hardening model with incremental plasticity option was adopted instead of others such as kinematic and combined ones .…”
Section: Verification Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the crack growth analyses of the CT specimen for ER316L, WRS simulation of a welding block was preceded. The temperature‐dependent thermal and mechanical properties of the TP316 base metal and ER316L weld metal used in this study were retrieved from previous studies and materials specification sheets of the manufacturers. In order to simulate material hardening behaviour, from the conservative engineering viewpoint, isotropic hardening model with incremental plasticity option was adopted instead of others such as kinematic and combined ones .…”
Section: Verification Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the concept of total input heat flow equivalence, the heat flow denoted by Q flux [J] generated to build a single bead with volume V flux [m 3 ] by applying unit heat flux density, q flux , during the duration of welding time, Δ t flux , can be represented as Qflux=qflux×Vflux×Δtflux where q flux is defined as the unit heat flux density (= ηVI / Av Δ t ) flux . η flux is the welding efficiency with a range of 0.7–0.8 . V flux [V], I flux [A] and A flux [m 2 ] are the welding voltage, welding current and cross‐sectional area of a weld wire, respectively.…”
Section: Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in this study, we utilized the prescribed temperature method as a valid engineering solution instead of the complex and time‐consuming heat flux method. The applicability of the prescribed temperature method is known to be simple compared with the heat flux method and to give reasonable accuracy on a solution …”
Section: Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations