2018
DOI: 10.1520/mpc20170119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual Stress in Selective Laser Melted Inconel 718: Influence of the Removal from Base Plate and Deposition Hatch Length

Abstract: The residual stress distribution in IN718 elongated prisms produced by selective laser melting was studied by means of neutron (bulk) and laboratory X-ray (surface) diffraction. Two deposition hatch lengths were considered. A horizontal plane near the top surface (perpendicular to the building direction) and a vertical plane near the lateral surface (parallel to the building direction) were investigated. Samples both in as-built (AB) condition and removed from the base plate (RE) were characterized. While surf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
33
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, some studies show that the connection between part and base plate contribute to the residual stress state. [5,[30][31][32] In general, the scanning parameters during SLM have a significant influence on residual stress state, due to changes in the heat input and thermal gradient: The scanning strategy with smaller hatch length in similar IN718 SLM samples [20,33] has shown the highest gradient in longitudinal and transversal directions in comparison with longer hatch, because of more localized laser energy input; the increase of the laser energy density by means of smaller scanning speed has shown to decrease residual stresses. [17] In the present case, the support structure can also be viewed as a process parameter since its shape and size can be changed depending on the component and its purpose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, some studies show that the connection between part and base plate contribute to the residual stress state. [5,[30][31][32] In general, the scanning parameters during SLM have a significant influence on residual stress state, due to changes in the heat input and thermal gradient: The scanning strategy with smaller hatch length in similar IN718 SLM samples [20,33] has shown the highest gradient in longitudinal and transversal directions in comparison with longer hatch, because of more localized laser energy input; the increase of the laser energy density by means of smaller scanning speed has shown to decrease residual stresses. [17] In the present case, the support structure can also be viewed as a process parameter since its shape and size can be changed depending on the component and its purpose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, distortion can be used as an inexpensive and fast assessment of the amount of RS in the part, [17,18] as well as for quality assurance scopes. In comparison to bulk residual stress analysis by neutron diffraction, [19,20] synchrotron radiation diffraction allows RS investigations in subsurface regions (up to 100 lm depth).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining elastic strains by measuring the variation of lattice spacing provides a powerful method to identify RS. This is achieved at the surface by Lab X-ray Diffraction (XRD), up to a depth of about 5 µm in metals, as well as in the bulk by Neutron Diffraction (ND) up to a depth of about a few mm to a few cm [11][12][13]. In this work, the bulk triaxial RS state was determined using ND and was combined with the Lab XRD biaxial RS state at the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only laser parameters and scanning strategy [7,21] must be taken into account, but also other factors basically poorly explored in the open literature such as the position on the base plate, the laser path, or the Argon flow [13]. Those factors cannot always be captured by simulations and sometimes are not experimentally measurable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%