2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/9946874
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual β-Cell Function in Type 1 Diabetes Followed for 2 Years after 3C Study

Abstract: Objective. To investigate the natural history and related factors of the pancreatic β-cell function in Chinese type 1 diabetic patients from 3C study Shantou center. Method. Stimulated C-peptide levels from follow-up data of 201 individuals in 3C study Shantou subgroup starting in 2012 were used. Residual β-cell function was defined as stimulated C − peptide   level … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, it has become apparent that a large proportion of individuals with type 1 diabetes have residual beta cell function [10,11], and that this is associated with fewer hypoglycaemic events and long-term complications, and better daily glycaemic control [12][13][14]. New therapeutic strategies such as treatment with verapamil, teplizumab, pleconaril or ribavirin or faecal transplantations have attempted to preserve residual beta cell function [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it has become apparent that a large proportion of individuals with type 1 diabetes have residual beta cell function [10,11], and that this is associated with fewer hypoglycaemic events and long-term complications, and better daily glycaemic control [12][13][14]. New therapeutic strategies such as treatment with verapamil, teplizumab, pleconaril or ribavirin or faecal transplantations have attempted to preserve residual beta cell function [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the article titled “Residual β -Cell Function in Type 1 Diabetes Followed for 2 Years after 3C Study” [ 1 ], Dr. Kun Lin was incorrectly listed as the corresponding author. The corresponding author is Dr. Qiong Zeng, as shown above.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%