1993
DOI: 10.13031/2013.28502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residue Type and Placement Effects on Decomposition: Field Study and Model Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
36
1
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Accumulation of soil organic matter at the soil surface was a result of surface placement of crop residues and a lack of soil disturbance that kept residues isolated from the rest of the soil profile. Decomposition of surfaceplaced residues is often slower than when incorporated in the soil profile [32,33], primarily because of less optimal moisture conditions [34]. The apparent soil organic matter accumulation in stubble retention treatments noted by these results is consistent with the findings of Lao et al [35] and Lin et al [36].…”
Section: The Distribution Of Soil Organic Matter and Total Nutrients supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Accumulation of soil organic matter at the soil surface was a result of surface placement of crop residues and a lack of soil disturbance that kept residues isolated from the rest of the soil profile. Decomposition of surfaceplaced residues is often slower than when incorporated in the soil profile [32,33], primarily because of less optimal moisture conditions [34]. The apparent soil organic matter accumulation in stubble retention treatments noted by these results is consistent with the findings of Lao et al [35] and Lin et al [36].…”
Section: The Distribution Of Soil Organic Matter and Total Nutrients supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore, DOC contents in the entire soil profile decreased with increasing soil depth. These results are consistent with previous reports in which the retaining time and effectiveness of SOC were verified to be prolonged and lowered with increasing soil depth (Ghidey and Alberts, 1993;Kalbitz, 2001;Kalbitz and Geyer, 2002). DOC contents in the soil profiles along the grassy slope all decreased with increasing soil depth, and the average DOC contents in the three profiles increase in the following order: back-slope (115.7 mg·kg -1 ) < mid-slope (148.2 mg·kg -1 ) < foot-slope (195.7 mg·kg -1 ).…”
Section: Doc Variations Along Soil Depth and The Hill Slopesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The plausible reason could be sampling time of last week of April chosen in the present study, while the annual rice-wheat cropping cycle ends in October and thus a large proportion of residues will decompose during rice season from June to October. The straw decomposition rates are generally slower for surface placed compared with incorporated residues (Ghidey and Alberts 1993;Beare et al 2002), therefore it has proved more efficient in C sequestration.…”
Section: Rice Grain Yield and N Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%