2008
DOI: 10.1021/bi8007802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residues Accessible in the Binding-Site Crevice of Transmembrane Helix 6 of the CB2 Cannabinoid Receptor

Abstract: We have used the substituted-cysteine accessibility method (SCAM) to map the residues in the sixth membrane-spanning segment of the CB2 cannabinoid receptor that contribute to the surface of the water-accessible binding-site crevice. Using a background of the mutant C2.59S which is relatively insensitive to the methanethiosulfonate (MTS) reagents, we mutated to cysteine, one at a time, 34 consecutive residues in TMH6 of the CB2 receptor. These mutant receptors were then expressed in HEK293 cells. By incubating… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ␣-helical domains of the receptor are shown as predicted by the CB 2 receptor homology model of Xie et al (45) derived from the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin. The end of helix VI on the extracellular side is shown as predicted by Nebane et al (77). The snake plot is in reasonable agreement with the reported structure of the CB 2 receptor in a bilayer obtained in a molecular simulation (67).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The ␣-helical domains of the receptor are shown as predicted by the CB 2 receptor homology model of Xie et al (45) derived from the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin. The end of helix VI on the extracellular side is shown as predicted by Nebane et al (77). The snake plot is in reasonable agreement with the reported structure of the CB 2 receptor in a bilayer obtained in a molecular simulation (67).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Specifically, five hydrophobic residues were found to be in close contact with all three ligands during docking simulations: V113, L192, L201, V261 and W258. Indeed, L201, V261 and W258 have previously been implicated in the formation of the ligand binding pocket [23, 39]. A prior report affirms that residue 3.32 is occupied by a negatively charged amino acid in biogenic amine receptors (D2 Dopamine, β2 Adrenergic and m3 Muscaranic) and that it is essential for recognition and binding of endogenous amines [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binding site anchoring interactions within the receptor for each ligand were based on earlier published docking studies for HU210 43 and for AM-841. 44,45 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%