2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1526-4998(200006)56:6<555::aid-ps167>3.0.co;2-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residues in apples and sweet cherries after methyl bromide fumigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EF is a fumigant that is usually used on perishable commodities, such as fruits and vegetables alternative to MB [27], whose schedule was phased out due to the ozonedepleting effect under the Montreal Protocol [28], its phytotoxic damage to perishable commodities [29], and chronic toxicity to human [30]. EF is also used on stored grain to control stored grain pests, such as Sitophilus oryzae, Tribolium castaneum, and Rhyzopertha dominica [31] and is an alternative to phosphine (PH 3 ) due to resistance causing the need for long exposure times [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EF is a fumigant that is usually used on perishable commodities, such as fruits and vegetables alternative to MB [27], whose schedule was phased out due to the ozonedepleting effect under the Montreal Protocol [28], its phytotoxic damage to perishable commodities [29], and chronic toxicity to human [30]. EF is also used on stored grain to control stored grain pests, such as Sitophilus oryzae, Tribolium castaneum, and Rhyzopertha dominica [31] and is an alternative to phosphine (PH 3 ) due to resistance causing the need for long exposure times [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23][24][25] The efficacy and acceptability of some of these methods are challenged by their ozone depletion potential, unacceptable phytotoxic effects on some fresh products, high levels of residue on fresh commodities, pesticide tolerance/resistance and/or ineffectiveness resulting from complex fumigation procedures. [26][27][28][29][30][31] Compared to these techniques, the hot water treatment (HWT) technique offers the best nonchemical alternative since it is reliable, efficient, viable and environmentally friendly. 32,33 The postharvest HWT technique is a suitable treatment for the control of other pests of quarantine importance such as codling moths and fruit flies in fresh produce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include irradiation, low oxygen treatments, heat/cold treatments and chemical fumigations using methyl bromide, sulfuryl fluoride, phosphine, ethanedinitrile, methyl benzoate and nitric oxide 21–25 . The efficacy and acceptability of some of these methods are challenged by their ozone depletion potential, unacceptable phytotoxic effects on some fresh products, high levels of residue on fresh commodities, pesticide tolerance/resistance and/or ineffectiveness resulting from complex fumigation procedures 26–31 . Compared to these techniques, the hot water treatment (HWT) technique offers the best non‐chemical alternative since it is reliable, efficient, viable and environmentally friendly 32,33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, methyl bromide is a stratospheric ozone‐depleting substance and its use is being phased out . Other chemical fumigants are also toxic to non‐targeted organisms and can be a potential source of pesticide residues on food . The need for sustainable, non‐residue bearing phytosanitary treatment technology is crucial to ensure food security and reduce environmental pollution …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%