2020
DOI: 10.1186/s11782-020-00092-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resignation of officials as independent directors and firm performance

Abstract: In 2013, the Chinese government implemented Rule No. 18, which suspended the directorships of incumbent government officials and precluded those who retired within the past three years from serving as independent directors for listed firms. The surprise implementation of Rule No. 18 triggered a wave of resignations among official independent directors (OIDs). The event provided a unique opportunity to examine the impacts of the political connections of board members on firm performance. We applied a difference… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in 2013, the Chinese Communist Party implemented "Rule No. 18," which forbade incumbent government officials and those who had retired in the previous three years to hold directorships (Ren et al, 2020;Wei et al, 2020). This policy change makes it impossible to compare PB director selection before and after 2013.…”
Section: Data and Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in 2013, the Chinese Communist Party implemented "Rule No. 18," which forbade incumbent government officials and those who had retired in the previous three years to hold directorships (Ren et al, 2020;Wei et al, 2020). This policy change makes it impossible to compare PB director selection before and after 2013.…”
Section: Data and Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there are three theories which every so often used to justify such association: resource dependence theory (Pfeffer and Salancik, 2003; Salancik, 1979), agency theory (Jensen and Meckling, 1976) and social exchange theory (Cook and Emerson, 1978; Homans, 1961). Resource dependence theory is used in Azmi et al (2020) and Ren et al (2020); Agency theory is used in Xu et al ’s (2016) paper. Social exchange theory is applied in Liu et al (2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have connected PCs with firms’ performance proxied by Tobin’s Q as seen in Niessen and Ruenzi (2010), Deng et al (2012), Wu et al (2012), Yang et al (2012), Muttakin et al (2015), Pérez et al (2015), Xu et al (2016), Chen et al (2017), Aldhamari et al (2020), Azmi et al (2020), Chen et al (2020), Harymawan et al (2019), Hu et al (2019), Ha and Frömmel (2020), Idris et al (2020), Joni et al (2020) and Ren et al (2020). Previous studies also use AR/CAR to measure firms’ performance, as seen in Goldman et al (2009), Amore and Bennedsen (2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Findings show both positive [Zhang, Truong, 2019] and negative [Hu et al, 2020] stock market reactions to the Rule announcement and political directors' exclusion from boards. In addition to the market reaction, the loss of political connections decreases companies' value [Chen, Zheng, Huang, 2020;Ren et al, 2020;Liu, Lin, Wu, 2018], long term financing, and government subsidies to private firms [Hu et al, 2020], and increases the risk [Ren et al, 2020]. At the same time, such directors could play a negative monitoring role and destroy value [Shi, Xu, Zhang, 2018].…”
Section: Political Directorsmentioning
confidence: 99%