2017
DOI: 10.1115/1.4035728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilience Analysis Framework for Interconnected Critical Infrastructures

Abstract: To investigate the resilience of interconnected critical infrastructures (CIs), a framework combining dynamic modeling and resilience analysis is proposed. Resilience is defined in this work as the capacity of a system to absorb the impacts of perturbations and recover quickly from disruptive states. It is seen as a property of the system, which depends on a number of design, operation, and control parameters. Within this framework, we introduce the concept of resilience regions in the parameters space: as lon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Characterizing vulnerability, risk, resilience, and/or sustainability of regional communities as systems-whether they are called coupled natural-human systems, socialecological systems, coupled human-environment systems, or hazards influencing global environmental change, in computer-compatible form-is of growing interest to both research and communities of practice in decision support [1][2][3][4][5]. For example, land use/land cover, water quantity, and water quality sub-systems exist within urban-regional systems as a combination of natural and built interconnected infrastructure systems, and are in need of comprehensive and robust management due to increasing complexities of spacetime interactions among nature, humans, and technology [6][7][8]. These natural and built interconnected infrastructures are complex systems because they exist as geospatial open systems, whether considered sustainable or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characterizing vulnerability, risk, resilience, and/or sustainability of regional communities as systems-whether they are called coupled natural-human systems, socialecological systems, coupled human-environment systems, or hazards influencing global environmental change, in computer-compatible form-is of growing interest to both research and communities of practice in decision support [1][2][3][4][5]. For example, land use/land cover, water quantity, and water quality sub-systems exist within urban-regional systems as a combination of natural and built interconnected infrastructure systems, and are in need of comprehensive and robust management due to increasing complexities of spacetime interactions among nature, humans, and technology [6][7][8]. These natural and built interconnected infrastructures are complex systems because they exist as geospatial open systems, whether considered sustainable or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These metrics provide a sound basis for the development of effective decisionmaking tools for multi-hazard environments and lead to significant savings through risk reduction and expeditious recovery. Liu et al (2017) introduced a method that combines dynamic modelling with resilience analysis. Interdependent critical infrastructures have been analysed using the framework by performing a numerical analysis of the resilience conditions in terms of design, operation, and control for a given failure scenario.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the studies are based on either the idea of estimating the inoperability of an IS following a catastrophic event by leveraging historical event data (Nateghi, 2018;Nateghi, Guikema, & Quiring, 2011), or the idea of predicting the time-dependent trajectory of the IS functionality under disruption through system operational models (Ouyang, Dueñas-Osorio, & Min, 2012;Panteli & Mancarella, 2017). Some scholars studied how to measure the resilience of interconnected ISs aiming to model the failure propagation across different systems (Fang & Zio, 2019a, 2019bLiu, Ferrario, & Zio, 2017;Ouyang & Wang, 2015;Pant, Barker, & Zobel, 2014). Recently, fairly comprehensive surveys of the growing literature on resilience assessment have been provided for general ISs (Hosseini, Barker, & Ramirez-Marquez, 2016) or specific systems like power grids (Wang, Chen, Wang, & Baldick, 2016) and transportation (Faturechi & Miller-Hooks, 2014;Mattsson & Jenelius, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%