Resilience and Stress in Later Life: A Network Analysis Approach Depicting Complex Interactions of Resilience Resources and Stress-Related Risk Factors in Older Adults

Abstract

Background Emerging systemic approaches on resilience propose that a person’s or group’s adaptability to significant stress relies on a network of interdependent resources. However, little knowledge exists on systemic resilience in older survivors of early-life adversity (ELA) and how ELA affects their resource network in later life. Objective This study investigated how ELA may be linked to the interplay of resources and stress-related risk factors in later life. Research Design and Methods Data from N = 235 older adults ( M age = 70.43 years; 46.40% female) were assessed. Half the participants were affected by ELA through compulsory social measures and placements in childhood, and/or adolescence (“risk group”). The other half were age-matched, non-affected participants (“control group”). Using psychometric instruments, a set of resilience-supporting resources in later life and current stress indices were assessed. Regularized partial correlation networks examined the interplay of resources in both groups, whilst also considering the impact of stress. Results Both groups demonstrated only positive resource interrelations. Although the control group showed more possible resource connections, the groups did not significantly differ in the overall strength of connections. While group-specific resource interrelations were identified, self-esteem was observed to be the most important resource for the network interconnectedness of both groups. The risk group network showed a higher vulnerability to current stress. Discussion and Implications Network analysis is a useful approach in the examination of the complex interrelationships between resilience resources and stress-related risk factors in older adulthood.

An exploratory comparison of resilience profiles of Swiss older adult survivors of child welfare‐related maltreatment and controls

“…Likewise, higher self‐esteem was also found in the resilient survivors only. Given that self‐esteem can be increased with training/therapy, it may be a particularly relevant intervention target aimed at survivors of adversity (Thoma et al, 2020 ). Future studies may look beyond the factors explored here to identify further, specifically protective factors against adversity.…”

Differential Pathways from Child Maltreatment Types to Insecure Adult Attachment Styles via Psychological and Social Resources: A Bayesian Network Analysis

“…Past studies have mainly focused on their independent effects (e.g., Maercker et al, 2021;Unger et al, 2014). However, recently there has been an increase in the application of a systems or network approach in the social sciences, which stresses interdependence rather than independence to better understand real-life phenomena, including child maltreatment (Fritz et al, 2018;Thoma et al, 2020). It is of utmost importance to adequately identify these potentially differential pathways to develop effective interventions, as survivors of child maltreatment have been shown to have an increased likelihood of experiencing ongoing violence linked to their insecure adult attachment (e.g., Bonache et al, 2019).…”

The influence of maladaptive coping modes, resilience, and job demands on emotional exhaustion in psychologists

“…There is increasing recognition that understanding whether individuals will display resilience under stress depends on the interaction between facilitative and interfering resources present in a specific context (Thoma et al, 2020). Therefore, whether psychologists will experience burnout from their work stress will depend both on their level of resilience and the extent to which they engage in maladaptive coping.…”

“…Despite resilience research dating back to the 1950s, there remains considerable variation in how it is conceptualized (Thoma et al, 2020). Some authors view resilience as a stable individual difference personality trait that impacts a person's capacity to self‐regulate (Klohnen, 1996; Waugh et al, 2008).…”