2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-03189-3_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilience from the United Nations Standpoint: The Challenges of “Vagueness”

Abstract: A United Nations program, at the crossroad between the development and the humanitarian mandate (UNISDR) turned the concept of resilience into a central vehicle for its worldwide program on disaster risk reduction. It is through an ethnographic study of the negotiation process, topped by interviews and text analyses that I suggest various characteristics to describe resilience in an international organization. With the perspective of the sociology of translation, I discuss, on the one hand, the UN's need to ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reproduction of a specific materiality goes along with the use of polished language – positive Globish (Kimber, 2019) – and particular phrases repeated at each session such as ‘May I take it that the preparatory committee is taking this proposal? I see no objection.…”
Section: Shaping Un Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reproduction of a specific materiality goes along with the use of polished language – positive Globish (Kimber, 2019) – and particular phrases repeated at each session such as ‘May I take it that the preparatory committee is taking this proposal? I see no objection.…”
Section: Shaping Un Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of resilience has gained huge currency in international development over recent years, portraying a vision for making the world a “better, stronger and safer place’ (Kimber, 2019). It originally became a popular concept in the context of the risk discourse – hazards, crises and disasters – in the late 1990s, superseding discussions about ‘vulnerability’ widely associated with the susceptibility to be harmed (Janssen and Ostrom, 2006) and becoming a positive replacement implying the possibility of adjustment, adaptation and recovery (Kimber, 2019). Conceptualised and adopted in different, sometimes conflicting, ways resilience continues to be debated theoretically and in relation to its practical application (Tanner et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resilience and Street-connected Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As outlined below, the "vagueness" of resilience discourses [32] adequately integrates branding narratives which tend to exclude the many nuances that resilience implies. Indeed, the main objective of branding discourses is not to account for the diverse and sometimes conflicting definitions of resilience, but to propose a clear-cut and positive image of the city.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%