2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilience in relation to older adults with multimorbidity: A scoping review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Male patients aged 65 years or younger felt obligated to support themselves, and their family members relied on their limited income, This is due to the traditional Chinese view of men as career-oriented and providing a pivotal part of family income ( Su et al, 2019 ; Wu et al, 2022 ), therefore, men had experienced higher economic burdens and lower levels of resilience. Patients aged 71 years and older were more likely to have multimorbidity ( Lenti et al, 2022 ), and their physical function, physical activity, psychological state, and quality of life were all lower ( Seong et al, 2022 ). While, this finding is at odds with earlier research, which indicated neither an upgrading in resilience with age ( Harms et al, 2019 ) nor a decrease with age ( Tamura et al, 2021 ; Musich et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male patients aged 65 years or younger felt obligated to support themselves, and their family members relied on their limited income, This is due to the traditional Chinese view of men as career-oriented and providing a pivotal part of family income ( Su et al, 2019 ; Wu et al, 2022 ), therefore, men had experienced higher economic burdens and lower levels of resilience. Patients aged 71 years and older were more likely to have multimorbidity ( Lenti et al, 2022 ), and their physical function, physical activity, psychological state, and quality of life were all lower ( Seong et al, 2022 ). While, this finding is at odds with earlier research, which indicated neither an upgrading in resilience with age ( Harms et al, 2019 ) nor a decrease with age ( Tamura et al, 2021 ; Musich et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychological resilience includes measures such as Ego Resiliency Scale (Block & Kremen, 1996), Resilience Appraisal Scale (Johnson et al, 2010), Resilience Scale for Adults (Friborg et al, 2003), and Dispositional Resilience (Bartone et al, 1989). General resilience appraises multidimensional aspects of resilience including personality, perseverance, coping, an internal locus of control, self-efficacy, and adaptation (Seong et al, 2022). General resilience can be specifically assessed using the 25-Item Resilience Scale (RS-25) (Wagnild & Young, 1993), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) (Connor & Davidson, 2003), and Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS) (Sinclair & Wallston, 2004).…”
Section: Measures Of Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research found that several items of the RS-25 were ambiguous and/or redundant for older adults, and participants scored high in resilience (Resnick & Inguito, 2011). It was suggested that those items could be removed, and therefore the modified version of RS-25 with 15 items has been used in several recent studies to measure resilience in older adults (Orwig et al, 2018; Resnick et al, 2019; Seong et al, 2022). In addition, 25 items add to participant burden and a more parsimonious measure of resilience that is psychometrically sound would be beneficial (Wagnild, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%