2017
DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2017.1383532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilience in transportation systems: a systematic review and future directions

Abstract: The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of the record. Please see the repository URL above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
139
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
139
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of the transportation system, resilience was defined as the ability of the system to "absorb disturbances, maintain its basic structure and function, and recover to a required level of service within an acceptable time and costs after being affected by disruptions" (Wan et al, 2018). Meanwhile, Wan et al (2018b) also emphasised the necessity of incorporating the diverse characterises of transportation resilience into a new evaluation framework, together with advanced quantitative modelling methods to deal with uncertainties in resilience assessment. Hence, in this study, a new risk parameter namely "climate resilience" has been added to address this need.…”
Section: Critical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of the transportation system, resilience was defined as the ability of the system to "absorb disturbances, maintain its basic structure and function, and recover to a required level of service within an acceptable time and costs after being affected by disruptions" (Wan et al, 2018). Meanwhile, Wan et al (2018b) also emphasised the necessity of incorporating the diverse characterises of transportation resilience into a new evaluation framework, together with advanced quantitative modelling methods to deal with uncertainties in resilience assessment. Hence, in this study, a new risk parameter namely "climate resilience" has been added to address this need.…”
Section: Critical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While international efforts to mitigate anthropogenic climate change continue, it is recognised that cities and communities must adapt to unavoidable changes in climate conditions. With over half of the global population residing in cities, and with the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events projected to increase, the resilience of transport infrastructure systems is a priority (Fiksel, 2003;Wan, Yang, Zhang, Yan, & Fan, 2018). Globally, the interconnectedness of social, built environment and natural systems is generating highly complex, dynamic challenges that require new design and engineering approaches .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of literature articulates the benefits of enhancing critical infrastructure resilience to climate change (Fiksel, 2003;Huq, Kovats, Reid, & Satterthwaite, 2007;IPCC, 2014a;Moensch, Tyler, & Lage, 2011;UNISDR, 2015). Yet despite recognition of the important role of critical infrastructure, there is still much to be done to improve resilience in transport networks worldwide (IPCC, 2014a;Regmi & Hanaoka, 2011;Wan et al, 2018). Where pursued at all, efforts to enhance infrastructure resilience typically involve singlepoint-in-time design adaptations to make the asset more rigid and impermeable to impact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, analyzing the reasons for ship detention in ship lock areas is helpful for administrative officers on actively responding to similar situations. Secondly, the proposed countermeasures, as well as the flexible approaches presented in this paper, can be tailored and used to achieve congestion risk reduction in other ship locks to improve the transportation safety and efficiency [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%