2015
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilience indicators: prospects and limitations for early warnings of regime shifts

Abstract: In the vicinity of tipping points—or more precisely bifurcation points—ecosystems recover slowly from small perturbations. Such slowness may be interpreted as a sign of low resilience in the sense that the ecosystem could easily be tipped through a critical transition into a contrasting state. Indicators of this phenomenon of ‘critical slowing down (CSD)’ include a rise in temporal correlation and variance. Such indicators of CSD can provide an early warning signal of a nearby tipping point. Or, they may offer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
552
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 432 publications
(559 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
6
552
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we found strong fluctuations in nonlinearity estimates, especially in the exploitation scenario (electronic supplementary material, figure S2f). Changes in variance and autocorrelation can also be unreliable in the presence of short time series [51], high levels of stochasticity [57], fast changing stress drivers [54,58] or due to portfolio effects [56] and life-history strategies [59]. Further research is needed to find if similar constraints hold for the elevated nonlinearity indicator we propose here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, we found strong fluctuations in nonlinearity estimates, especially in the exploitation scenario (electronic supplementary material, figure S2f). Changes in variance and autocorrelation can also be unreliable in the presence of short time series [51], high levels of stochasticity [57], fast changing stress drivers [54,58] or due to portfolio effects [56] and life-history strategies [59]. Further research is needed to find if similar constraints hold for the elevated nonlinearity indicator we propose here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSD indicators can capture changes in these dynamics but only when it comes to stable equilibria in the presence of weak stochasticity [12]. Identifying transitions across chaotic attractors or, more generally, in systems with nonlinear dynamics may be difficult with CSD indicators [53,54]. By contrast, EDM-derived nonlinearity may be broader in its application as it can capture changes in dynamics beyond stable attractors typical of the dynamics encountered in natural systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…89 There has been much semantic and theoretical treatment of the resilience concept, but 90 here we are concerned with identifying metrics for real world applications. An ecological 91 system can be defined by the species composition at any point in time [26] and there is a 92 rich ecological literature, both theoretical and experimental, that focusses on the stability of 93 communities [16,[27][28][29] with potential relevance to resilience. Of course, the species in a 94 community are essential to the provision of many ecosystem functions which are the 95 biological foundation of ecosystem services [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'critical slowing down' [53]. However, these properties only occur before critical transitions in a subset of cases and thus are likely to be poor general predictive indicators of resilience [91]. A focus on emergent properties of systems also ignores the mechanisms that underpin resilience and therefore has limited ability to inform management advice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some early warning signals may fail to predict regime shifts (e.g. increasing variance [41]), limiting their use in all ecosystems. Therefore, it may be advantageous to use methods that are shaped by spatio-temporal scaling processes, such as body size discontinuity analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%