2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99843-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilience of Electrical Distribution Systems with Critical Load Prioritization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these methods include multi‐agent self‐healing schemes [8, 9], automatic microgrid formation [10], optimised placement of automatic switches [11, 12], and optimal planning of FLISR operation [13, 14]. Since resilience to extreme conditions is particularly important for critical customers some efforts have been made to develop load restoration plans based on load prioritisation [15] and human well‐being level [16] calculated by interruption costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these methods include multi‐agent self‐healing schemes [8, 9], automatic microgrid formation [10], optimised placement of automatic switches [11, 12], and optimal planning of FLISR operation [13, 14]. Since resilience to extreme conditions is particularly important for critical customers some efforts have been made to develop load restoration plans based on load prioritisation [15] and human well‐being level [16] calculated by interruption costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These scenarios have the following form. First, the power flow in each distribution line is computed using a power‐flow model that has been described in the previous work, together with a combination of load shedding and curtailment [13]. Second, this model relies critically on the health and connectivity of the cyber system only.…”
Section: Test Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the critical failure propagation is explored. Huang et al described the result of how determined failure allocation is different from that of random failure allocation [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation