Resilience of environmental policy amidst the rise of conservative populism

Abstract

Sustainability has for long been promoted as a medium for social and economic development, one that focuses on constant availability of natural assets and ecological amenities. By questioning the possibility of reaching a balanced and sustainable state of functioning for social-ecological systems, resilience improves the static framework of sustainability by acknowledging non-linear behavior of complex systems, inevitability of change, and consistent presence of uncertainty. At the core of sustainable development, environmental policy is embedded in the socio-spatial structures that constantly re-organize and breed uncertainty, such as political, economic, and climate uncertainty. These uncertainties create episodes of instability that shock the entire system including the structures of environmental protection. In this article, focusing on the aftermath of 2016 US presidential election and 2018 general election in Brazil, both broadly recognized as political shocks, we highlight the vulnerabilities of environmental protection structures to the rise of conservative populist movements. We attribute these vulnerabilities, partially, to the superiority of market-based instruments, as well as apolitical understandings of resilience under neoliberalism that overlook political instabilities and socio-spatial outcomes of neoliberal restructuring projects. In our assessment, political unpreparedness of sustainability against the right-wing onslaught in the US and Brazil further underlines the need for resilience theory to incorporate sources of political instability in order to protect the environment.

Does Adopting Environmental Tax Contribute to Achieving Sustainable Development in Lebanon? A Survey of Academics and LCPAs

“…The conservatives see that the presence of a government that has resources and can use it to protect the environment while the market would fail to allocate resources efficiently. Because the sole interest of the private sector is profit, and because of externalities, the environment would definitely get contaminated (Mostafavi et al, 2022). The economists, on the other hand, see that the market may encounter some deformations externalities but these can be corrected using proper fiscal and monetary policies; thus, there is no possible way to prevent pollution 100 percent as development increases (Beer et al, 2023).…”

Evidence of validity and reliability of the environmental action scale in Peruvian university students

“…Despite the growing concern about the deterioration of the environment and biodiversity, as well as for the negative effects of human actions on various species and their ecosystems, this issue has not yet been given due importance in the policies of many countries (Carmona et al, 2023). On the other hand, although several groups or movements have emerged in recent decades to advocate for environmental protection and conservation (Mostafavi et al, 2022), it has not yet been possible to create a generalized awareness of the importance of changing life habits to reduce environmental impact (Muhammad et al, 2020). Therefore, the environmental impact of human activity has led the planet to its sixth mass extinction of species (Bermúdez-Tamayo et al, 2023).…”