2019 IEEE International Test Conference (ITC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/itc44170.2019.9000150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resiliency of automotive object detection networks on GPU architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, hardware-specific NNs, ranging from circuits for embedded machine learning applications to custom Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) of neural networks in silicon, are traditionally considered tightly robust to hardware faults (HW faults). However, several recent studies have demonstrated that HW faults induced by an external perturbation (i.e., in a harsh environment) or due to silicon wearout and aging effects can significantly impact the inference leading to CNN prediction failures [10,11,12]. Therefore, ensuring the reliability of CNNs is crucial, especially when they are deployed in safety-critical and mission-critical applications, such as robotics, aeronautics, smart healthcare, and autonomous driving [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, hardware-specific NNs, ranging from circuits for embedded machine learning applications to custom Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) of neural networks in silicon, are traditionally considered tightly robust to hardware faults (HW faults). However, several recent studies have demonstrated that HW faults induced by an external perturbation (i.e., in a harsh environment) or due to silicon wearout and aging effects can significantly impact the inference leading to CNN prediction failures [10,11,12]. Therefore, ensuring the reliability of CNNs is crucial, especially when they are deployed in safety-critical and mission-critical applications, such as robotics, aeronautics, smart healthcare, and autonomous driving [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning physical-based FI, we can cite [2], where the reliability dependence on three different Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) architectures (Kepler, Maxwell, and Pascal) was evaluated executing the Darknet Neural Network [8] when exposed to atmospheric-like neutrons. In [9], the authors analyse the reliability of a 54-layer Deep Neural Network injecting faults in the network weights and input data using an accelerated neutron beam for studying transient errors and FI tests to simulate permanent faults. The inferences target floating-point values, and the results show that object detection networks tend to generate wrong results when exposed to hardware faults.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [16], the authors studied the radiation-induced soft-errors based on AxC techniques applied to the data representation of weights in a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Withal, by using an accelerated neutron beam to inject transient errors and fault injection experiments for permanent errors, the reliability of a 54-layer CNN is assessed by exposing the entire GPU to the radiation source [17].…”
Section: A Radiation-based Fault Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%