Resilient and sustainable supplier selection via a new framework: a case study from the steel industry

Ghamari, Roya; Mahdavi-Mazdeh, Mohammad; Ghannadpour, Seyed Farid

doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01872-5

Cited by 20 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 132 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies in the climate change cluster have focused mainly on adaptation strategies and livelihoods (De & Das, 2021 ; Ghazali et al, 2021 ; Islam et al, 2022 ), and resilience evaluation (Ghamari et al, 2022 ; Rai et al, 2021 ; Zhao et al, 2022 ).…”

Section: Results Of Bibliometric and Content Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric analysis of sustainability papers: Evidence from Environment, Development and sustainability

Ellili

2023

Environ Dev Sustain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to highlight the current trends in the literature on sustainability by applying a bibliometric review of papers on sustainability published in Environment, Development and Sustainability . Bibliometric analysis is a quantitative approach to bibliographic materials that highlights the core theoretical and empirical research on a specific field. In addition, it allows the classification of previous studies. Previous bibliometric reviewers were limited to sustainability papers in specific industries, while this study considers all papers on sustainability to provide further insights on overall sustainability topics. The analysis was based on keyword cartography analysis, bibliometric authors’ citation analysis, bibliometric papers’ citation analysis, bibliometric references’ co-citation analysis, journals’ co-citation cartography, and qualitative content analysis. A total of 997 articles on sustainability were reviewed. Bibliometric analysis was performed using VOSviewer and content analysis was performed using WordStat. Six major clusters were identified: environmental sustainability, sustainable development, urban sustainability, ecological footprint, environment, and climate change. In addition, the results reveal that Environment, Development and Sustainability has increasingly experienced important growth in research papers and citations, reflecting its significant contribution to the sustainability research field. In addition, this study presents recommendations for future research opportunities in the field of sustainability. The findings of this study have implications for sustainability research, such as the assessment of environmental and social sustainability in multinational institutional contexts and across industries as well as the examination of the impact of environmental and social sustainability on different corporate aspects and decisions. This study is the only one to review the key topics on which papers published in Environment, Development and Sustainability are focused and can be largely used for sustainability practices. This study provides an overview of how the literature on sustainability has developed, as well as a summary of the most productive authors, along with countries, organizations, and journal sources. This offers an opportunity for future research to focus on this topic.

show abstract

Section: Results Of Bibliometric and Content Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric analysis of sustainability papers: Evidence from Environment, Development and sustainability

Ellili

2023

Environ Dev Sustain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, the availability, capacity, and collaboration of the right suppliers are crucial for the success of circular construction projects (Goyal et al, 2022; Gupta & Singh, 2021; Tseng et al, 2021). The most important step in designing a circular supply chain is to collaborate with suppliers of circular construction materials and products situated in the upstream chain, impacting the downstream chain (Ghamari et al, 2021). While selecting suitable suppliers in circular construction supply chain management constitutes a complex task requiring a comprehensive evaluation strategy, those with adequate technological capacity, attention to air pollution and energy consumption in production and recycling products, producing products using recyclable raw materials, utilizing clean and green technology in production and recycling products, employing eco‐friendly materials for packaging products, reverse logistics, and respecting environmental regulations and standards can provide significant input in the project design and circular construction supply chain management (Asgari & Asgari, 2021; Ferasso et al, 2020; Hina et al, 2022).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of the critical success factors for implementing circular economy in construction projects

Wuni¹

2022

Sustainable Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The transition to a circular economy in the construction industry provides enormous opportunities to decouple construction activities, processes, and practices from finite consumption of natural resources and environmental externalities. Circular construction leverages the interconnected models of narrowing, slowing, and closing resource loops to minimize extractive and wasteful use of natural resources, eliminate waste and pollution from the outset, and retain construction products and materials in use for a longer duration. However, construction practitioners have struggled to implement circular economy principles into construction projects successfully. This study systematically reviewed the critical success factors for implementing circular construction projects. The results revealed 51 critical success factors for circular construction projects, clustered into six typologies: technological (n = 10, Σ = 93, μ = 9.30), supply chain (n = 14, Σ = 84, μ = 6.00), organizational (n = 9, Σ = 82, μ = 9.11), institutional (n = 7, Σ = 43, μ = 6.14), stakeholder success (n = 7, Σ = 73, μ = 10.43), and management success factors (n = 4, Σ = 27, μ = 6.75). A Pareto analysis revealed 30 vital critical success factors for circular construction projects. Thus, the study established the first comprehensive set of critical success strategies for circular construction projects and enriches the knowledge of construction organizations and project team members on how best to implement circular economy principles in construction projects.

show abstract

“…As shown in table 1, integrated MCDM methods with different approaches such as fuzzy, gray and so on are also applied to select the optimal sustainable supplier selection. AHP [24] Voting AHP [3] Fuzzy VIKOR and Fuzzy AHP [25] TOPSIS and AHP [6] VIKOR and AHP [4] Fuzzy TOPSIS [26] Gray and TOPSIS [27] Rough-Fuzzy and TOPSIS-DEMATEL [28] Fuzzy best worst method (FBWM) [29] BWM and fuzzy and Shannon entropy and fuzzy MULTIMOORA [30] DEMATEL and Rough sets [31] MILP and AHP [32] Goal programming and DEA and Neural Network [33] Benders decomposition algorithm and DEA [34] AHP and ELECTRE [35] Structural Equation Modeling [36] BWM and Alternative queuing method [37] Fuzzy importance and performance analysis [38] Fuzzy Gray Rational Analysis and Fuzzy TOPSIS and Fuzzy VIKOR [39] Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS (IF-TOPSIS), A modified two-phase fuzzy goal programming model [40] fuzzy TOPSIS, trapezoidal type-2 fuzzy AHP and goal programming [41] BWM and TOPSIS…”

Section: Sustainable Supplier Selection Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy-based CODAS for sustainable supplier selection

Afzali

Afzali²,

Pourmohammadi³

2022

Soft Comput

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the advent of information age, supplier selection has attracted researchers' attention in the field of supply chain management. Optimal supplier selection meets the competitiveness of industries and satisfaction of customers in the supply chain management. However, considering sustainable factors including environmental and social parameters, alongside customers' expectations are the main challenge of supplier selection. Moreover, incomplete and hesitation among experts' judgment result in uncertainty that leads the more complex assessment of criteria. In this paper, an innovative multi-criteria decision making method was developed to address supplier selection process and supplier order allocation based on customers' expectations with respect to the sustainable primers. The proposed method was based on fuzzy Combinative Distance-based Assessment (CODAS) extended with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy (IVIF) for multi-criteria sustainable supplier selection. The proposed model was combined with hesitation linguistic set to provide two goals including a: dealing with experts' hesitation as well as imprecise and vague of decision makers' knowledge in order to express assessment values. b: coping with missing or nonexistence of attribute assessment values. The proposed method was performed on a steel mill as a case study to illustrate the effectiveness of decision process on four suppliers in detail. The results showed

show abstract

Resilient and sustainable supplier selection via a new framework: a case study from the steel industry

Cited by 20 publications

References 132 publications

Bibliometric analysis of sustainability papers: Evidence from Environment, Development and sustainability

Bibliometric analysis of sustainability papers: Evidence from Environment, Development and sustainability

A systematic review of the critical success factors for implementing circular economy in construction projects

An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy-based CODAS for sustainable supplier selection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About