Resilient Integration of Distributed High-Performance Zones into the BelWue Network Using OpenFlow

Menth, Michael; Schmidt, Mark B.; Reutter, Daniel; Finze, Robert; Neuner, Sebastian; Kleefass, Tim

doi:10.1109/mcom.2017.1600177

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Novel methods are proposed for "east-west" inter-controller exchange and domain virtualization. Meanwhile, [12] proposes a resilient SDN architecture for connecting highperformance zones in a higher-education network. The authors also use OpenFlow devices to perform failover switching for isolated link outages.…”

Section: Existing Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Still, SDN only provides a control framework and relegates detailed service provisioning and recovery algorithm design to operators themselves. Despite some notable testbed studies [11]- [12] [13], there are no known works on SDN-based disaster recovery. Hence, this effort focuses on translating advanced counter-EMP service recovery schemes (only studied in research literature) into real-world settings by developing a resilient SDN-based management and orchestration (MANO) framework.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

SDN Testbed for Evaluation of Large Exo-Atmospheric EMP Attacks

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Existing Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

SDN Testbed for Evaluation of Large Exo-Atmospheric EMP Attacks

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…is not acceptable for SDN, because unprotected flows remain disconnected or FRR-caused loops persist until the controller comes to rescue. Several solutions based on OpenFlow have been proposed in the literature so far, e.g., based on ideas from LFA [192], [264] or MPLS [254], by encoding primary and backup paths in the packet header [255], or by extending to OpenFlow's fast failover action based on additional state in the OpenFlow pipeline: for example, SPIDER [260] leverages packet labels to carry reroute and connectivity information. An alternative OpenFlow switch design which relies on logical group ports and which aims to support connectivity monitoring, has been proposed by Kempf et al [254] in the context of MPLS networks.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Survey of Fast-Recovery Mechanisms in Packet-Switched Networks

Chiesa

Kamisiński

Rak

et al. 2021

IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to meet their stringent dependability requirements, most modern packet-switched communication networks support fast-recovery mechanisms in the data plane. While reactions to failures in the data plane can be significantly faster compared to control plane mechanisms, implementing fast recovery in the data plane is challenging, and has recently received much attention in the literature. This survey presents a systematic, tutorial-like overview of packet-based fast-recovery mechanisms in the data plane, focusing on concepts but structured around different networking technologies, from traditional link-layer and IP-based mechanisms, over BGP and MPLS to emerging software-defined networks and programmable data planes. We examine the evolution of fast-recovery standards and mechanisms over time, and identify and discuss the fundamental principles and algorithms underlying different mechanisms. We then present a taxonomy of the state of the art, summarize the main lessons learned, and propose a few concrete future directions.

show abstract

“…The second is not acceptable for SDN, because unprotected flows remain disconnected or FRR-caused loops persist until the controller comes to rescue. Several solutions based on OpenFlow have been proposed in the literature so far, e.g., based on ideas from LFA [184], [255] or MPLS [245], by encoding primary and backup paths in the packet header [246], or by extending to OpenFlow's fast failover action based on additional state in the OpenFlow pipeline: for example, SPIDER [251] leverages packet labels to carry reroute and connectivity information.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Survey of Fast Recovery Mechanisms in the Data Plane

Chiesa¹,

Kamisiński²,

Rak³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to meet their stringent dependability requirements, most modern communication networks support fast-recovery mechanisms in the data plane. While reactions to failures in the data plane can be significantly faster compared to control plane mechanisms, implementing fast recovery in the data plane is challenging, and has recently received much attention in the literature. This survey presents a systematic, tutorial-like overview of packet-based fast-recovery mechanisms in the data plane, focusing on concepts but structured around different networking technologies, from traditional link-layer and IP-based mechanisms, over BGP and MPLS to emerging software-defined networks and programmable data planes. We examine the evolution of fast-recovery standards and mechanisms over time, and identify and discuss the fundamental principles and algorithms underlying different mechanisms. We then present a taxonomy of the state of the art and compile open research questions.<br>

show abstract

Resilient Integration of Distributed High-Performance Zones into the BelWue Network Using OpenFlow

Cited by 5 publications

References 3 publications

SDN Testbed for Evaluation of Large Exo-Atmospheric EMP Attacks

SDN Testbed for Evaluation of Large Exo-Atmospheric EMP Attacks

A Survey of Fast-Recovery Mechanisms in Packet-Switched Networks

A Survey of Fast Recovery Mechanisms in the Data Plane

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About