2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilient seismic design of reinforced concrete framed buildings with metallic fuses including soil-structure interaction effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hall and Giglio [17] emphasize the relevance of proper target resilience values and suggest that cost analysis may lead to optimal targets. Other researchers [18,19] that have oriented their efforts to propose a seismic resilience-based design have recommended target post-earthquake scenarios, such as Immediate Occupancy (IO), Rapid Recovery (RR), and Collapse Prevention (CP); nevertheless, there are no explicit discussions regarding the specific resilience or downtime values associated with such target scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hall and Giglio [17] emphasize the relevance of proper target resilience values and suggest that cost analysis may lead to optimal targets. Other researchers [18,19] that have oriented their efforts to propose a seismic resilience-based design have recommended target post-earthquake scenarios, such as Immediate Occupancy (IO), Rapid Recovery (RR), and Collapse Prevention (CP); nevertheless, there are no explicit discussions regarding the specific resilience or downtime values associated with such target scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the current contributions, there are still opportunity areas in seismic resilience assessment and its interpretation. For instance, current studies present important simplifications such as estimating indirect losses as a fraction of direct losses [4,7] and the lack of a proper interpretation of the resilience values found [4,19]. For the above reasons, this paper presents a procedure to define expected recovery times, expected delay times, and expected functionality loss curves to be used in the seismic resilience assessment of buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%