“…In the particular case of Mexico City, considering also the large extent of damage observed in buildings designed with collapse-prevention codes when subjected to spectral accelerations below those assumed in their design (1987)(1988)(1989)(1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004) codes, e.g. [28], it is clear to the authors that to improve seismic resilience in the future: (a) it should be mandatory to use resilient-based concepts for the seismic retrofit and upgrading of existing structures (damaged or apparently undamaged), (b) new buildings should be designed using resilient-based design procedures (e.g., [26] and performance-based procedures directed to achieve operational performance objectives, (c) city authorities should start working in developing, publishing and promoting the use of a new resilient-based seismic design code in the near future, (d) the role of local city authorities (each one of Mexico City´s political and administrative Districts) would be crucial in enforcing and assuring an acceptable minimum of resilience in the construction of new structures and the retrofitting of new ones, and e) coordinated programs for the structural health monitoring of typical representative buildings for the city (including old, retrofit and new buildings) should be implemented and the gathered information used to detect and correct potential structural deficiencies on time before the next strong earthquake may strike. In addition, complementary detailed vulnerability studies should be done to screen and prioritize the types of building construction and sectors of the city which should be attended first to improve their seismic resilience with well-planned, programmed retrofit, strengthen or replacement projects (midterm and long-term coordinated projects), where information gathered in structural health monitoring of buildings is of paramount importance.…”