2014
DOI: 10.1080/17509653.2013.869040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilient supplier selection under a fuzzy environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is true that the existing research have shown promising potential of MCDA methods and fuzzy techniques in supplier selection problems (Gan et al, 2019;Haldar et al, 2012Haldar et al, , 2014Hasan, Shohag, Azeem, Paul, & Management, 2015;Jiang, Faiz, & Hassan, 2018). However, there are limitations of the state-of-the-art literatures: (i) to the best of our knowledge, no existing research extends F-MADM framework in supplier evaluation problems leveraging large number of information (time series and graphical information), (ii) no prior study investigated F-MADM approach for evaluating suppliers' performance from resilience and logistics 4.0 perspective, simultaneously, and (iii) it is not clear how fuzzy based TOPSIS can be extended to process inherent uncertainty in decision relevant information associated with both the quantitative and qualitative attributes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is true that the existing research have shown promising potential of MCDA methods and fuzzy techniques in supplier selection problems (Gan et al, 2019;Haldar et al, 2012Haldar et al, , 2014Hasan, Shohag, Azeem, Paul, & Management, 2015;Jiang, Faiz, & Hassan, 2018). However, there are limitations of the state-of-the-art literatures: (i) to the best of our knowledge, no existing research extends F-MADM framework in supplier evaluation problems leveraging large number of information (time series and graphical information), (ii) no prior study investigated F-MADM approach for evaluating suppliers' performance from resilience and logistics 4.0 perspective, simultaneously, and (iii) it is not clear how fuzzy based TOPSIS can be extended to process inherent uncertainty in decision relevant information associated with both the quantitative and qualitative attributes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used five resilience criteria (density, complexity, node criticality, responsiveness and re-engineering) for the supplier selection process. More recently, Haldar, Ray, Banerjee and Ghosh [21] proposed a fuzzy group decision-making approach for resilient supplier selection using triangular and trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. They considered investment, responsiveness, and capacity of holding inventory as resilient criteria.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus it crucial to provide a reliable level of resilience to the supply side to protect such shortages especially during HILP events [9].Several studies have been conducted to consider resilience in the supply chain [8,10,11]. The concept of resilience in specific to the supplier selection problem has also been discussed by several authors [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Most of these studies focused on multiple sourcing and operational performance of suppliers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that the ranking order for the five alternatives is A 2 A 4 A 3 A 5 A 1 and A 2 is the most suitable supplier. The above supplier selection problem was also solved by the fuzzy VIKOR [18] and the fuzzy TOPSIS [21] methods. The ranking results of the candidate suppliers as derived via the application of these methods and the proposed IFH-VIKOR method are shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Criteria Decision Makersmentioning
confidence: 99%