Resilient Turns: Epistrophe, Incrementum, Metonymy

Abeles, Oren; Jack, Jordynn; Singer, Sarah Ann

doi:10.13008/2151-2957.1300

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Given their usefulness and power, it is no surprise that metonyms pervade our language. Burke (1941) classically argued that science itself is the work of metonymy, in which the scientific method serves as a mechanism for reducing a phenomenal effect-the result observed in the world-to a material cause-the conditions that prompted it, as Abeles et al (2020) detailed. Viewed through this lens, the hydrologic cycle, gravity, and the laws of motion are vehicles that serve to make a relational coupling between phenomenal effect and material world.…”

Section: Grass Versus Trees As a Proxy Debatementioning

confidence: 99%

Grass versus trees: A proxy debate for deeper anxieties about competing stream worlds

Gottschalk Druschke,

Booth,

Lave

et al. 2023

Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stream restoration has become an increasingly important focus in southwestern Wisconsin's Driftless Area, an unglaciated, hilly pocket of the Upper Mississippi River Basin rich in groundwater-driven coldwater streams, recreationally important trout species, and agricultural communities. Climate change is driving a major increase in precipitation and flooding across this rural and often under-resourced region, effects complicated by the ongoing legacies of white settlement and the changes it wrought to area streams, including the burial of floodplains in sediment displaced off area hillslopes. As managers work to consider how to “restore” Driftless streams, riparian vegetation—grass versus trees—has become a central and surprisingly controversial node. Current stream restoration practice typically includes the removal of riparian trees, though that practice has come under increasing criticism. Grounded in more than 5 years of qualitative and biophysical fieldwork in the region, we build from interviews gathered with 18 Driftless Area stream restoration managers from 2018 to 2020 to point to the ways that managers leverage arguments about erosion, flooding, habitat, and angler access, among other things, in service of grass and trees. Indexing the surface flows and underflows of this restoration debate, we introduce the rhetorical concept of the proxy debate to argue that debates about grass versus trees are tethered to competing perspectives on scale, temporality, and dynamism, surficial distractions from much deeper anxieties about what a stream is and should be. We turn to the ways that these distractions serve to further distance the stream restoration enterprise from acknowledging the ongoing human and hydrologic legacies of settler colonialism, and we close by suggesting that careful attention to rhetorical power—both to what arguments say and do, and to what they elide—offers a tentative first step toward restoring lands and relations by questioning what is taken for granted and what lies beneath.

show abstract

Section: Grass Versus Trees As a Proxy Debatementioning

confidence: 99%