Resin bonded bridgework: a review

Saunders, W. P.

doi:10.1016/0300-5712(89)90030-4

Cited by 29 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 86 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…18,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30] However, more complicated geometry and design structure, the low retention rate of RBFPD, in contrast to conventional fixed partial dentures (FPD), is still a vital issue in prosthetic dentistry. The low retention rate between the retainer and abutment tooth usually causes interface de-bonding between metal and abutment teeth after under repeated loading during longterm use.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The low retention rate between the retainer and abutment tooth usually causes interface de-bonding between metal and abutment teeth after under repeated loading during longterm use. [2][3][4]18,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30] In order to provide superior bonding strength and reduce the stress at the prosthesis/abutment teeth interface, many studies have presented several effective techniques to improve the adhesive agents or new materials instead of the original rigid metal retainers. [4][5][6][7][8] However, clinical experience still shows unsatisfactory survival rate (only 40%) for mandibular RB prostheses.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Multi-factorial retainer design analysis of posterior resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: a finite element study

Lin

Hsu

2005

Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-factorial retainer design analysis of posterior resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: a finite element study

Lin

Hsu

2005

Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Several clinical overviews were published (Marinello et al, 1987;Saunders, 1989), and recently a meta-analysis was performed (Creugers and Van't Hof, 1991). The meta-analysis revealed that the literature contains an enormous heterogeneity in survival-data, most of them related to the design and the conditions ofthe particular study.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

A Seven-and-a-half-year Survival Study of Resin-bonded Bridges

1992

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A clinical trial, concerning 203 resin-bonded bridges (RBBs), was performed for investigation of the influence of retainer-type and cementation materials on the survival of these restorations. The survival rates after a 7.5-year follow-up were 75% for anterior RBBs and 44% for posterior bridges. Etched metal RBBs (E-bridges) were significantly more retentive than perforated RBBs (P-bridges); the survival rates were 78% and 63%, respectively. With respect to the cementation materials, Clearfil F, in combination with E-bridges, had the best overall survival (89%, anterior and posterior). Maxillary anterior RBBs were more susceptible to failure than mandibular anterior RBBs.

show abstract

“…The resulting resin-bonded prostheses are characterized by their minimal tooth destruction, longevity and good aesthetics (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Longitudinal Observation for the Resin-Bonded Bridges

Pryliński¹

2004

Int J Oral-Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of the study was to perform a long-term clinical evaluation of resin-bonded bridges. Tooth preparation was restricted to the enamel in both anterior and posterior teeth. The study evaluated 58 bridges made for 44 patients between 1985 and 2003 in the Prosthodontics Department of the Medical School in Poznan, Poland, and in a private practice. All of the bridges were prepared by one dentist, the author of this article. The success rate of these resin-bonded bridges was determined on the basis of the following factors: adequate function, integrity of the bonds, absence of marginal caries, and high degree of patient satisfaction. The average success rate over the 18 years of observation was 82.8%, whereas the mean average time of the retention of the resin bonded bridges in the oral cavity was 6 years 8 months. Ten of the 58 bridges (116 abutments) were considered failures because of debonding or the need to carry out endodontic treatment due to caries. The average duration of the resin-bonded prostheses in the oral cavity was 5 years, 8 months. Resin-bonded bridges on anterior maxillary teeth do not disturb the occlusion or articulation, which widens their use to patients with a deep over-bite.

show abstract

Resin bonded bridgework: a review

Cited by 29 publications

References 86 publications

Multi-factorial retainer design analysis of posterior resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: a finite element study

Multi-factorial retainer design analysis of posterior resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: a finite element study

A Seven-and-a-half-year Survival Study of Resin-bonded Bridges

Longitudinal Observation for the Resin-Bonded Bridges

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About