Resin-ceramic bonding: A review of the literature

Blatz, Markus B.; Sadan, Avishani; Kern, Matthias

doi:10.1067/mpr.2003.50

Cited by 839 publications

(870 citation statements)

References 78 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

757

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The most favourable situation was for ceramic and composite inlays with original application of SE Bond (groups 1 and 3). Ceramic might be more aggressive to axial and cervical margins under loading as the presence of enamel fractures is increased with respect to composite inlays which might contribute to a better adhesion between ceramic and luting composite material [2]. Very low scores of "continuous margin" were attained by the direct composite groups (5 and 6).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: Marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to evaluate the marginal adaptation of CEREC ceramic inlays, CEREC composite inlays and direct composite restorations in unbeveled proximal slot cavities under artificial aging conditions. Two groups of each restoration type were prepared (n=6), one group with a self-etch adhesive, the other group with H 3 PO 4 enamel etching before the self-etch adhesive application. Replicas were generated before and after long-term thermo-mechanical loading under dentinal fluid simulation and margins were evaluated at ×200 magnification in the scanning electron miscroscope (SEM). Statistically, significant differences were found before and after loading with respect to the percentages of "continuous margins", the direct composite filling with H 3 PO 4 enamel etching giving the lowest percentages of "continuous margins" after loading (p<0.05). The highest percentage of "continuous margin" was attained by composite inlays without H 3 PO 4 enamel etching. However, these results were not significantly different from ceramic inlays after stressing. Polymerization shrinkage is still one critical property of composite restorative materials. The marginal adaptation of indirect adhesive proximal slot restorations without enamel bevels both fabricated out of composite and ceramic is better than that of directly placed composite restorations.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: Marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, these ceramics are not suitable for acid etching 8,[14][15][16] . For this reason, surface treatment methods ranging from air abrasion with aluminum oxide (Al 2O3) 8,[17][18][19][20] and silica coating with silica-modified Al2O3 particles 9,17,18,21) to laser application are frequently used on Y-TZP restorations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of ultrashort pulsed laser on bond strength of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic to tooth surfaces

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is limited knowledge about the effects of ultrashort pulsed laser on zirconia ceramic surfaces. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of ytterbium (Yb)-doped fiber laser and other surface treatment methods -namely, sandblasting with 110 µm aluminum oxide or 30 µm silica-coated alumina on shear bond strength (SBS) of zirconia to tooth surface. A total of 128 zirconium oxide disks were made by using CAD-CAM technology. Disk surfaces were sandblasted with Al2O3 particles or silica-coated alumina or irradiated with Yb-doped fiber based nanosecond pulsed laser at 85W output power at 25 kHz. Disks were luted to dentin using two different resin cement. SBS of each specimen was measured. Results were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni and Dunnett tests (p<0.005). Highest bond strength was obtained when zirconia surface was pretreated with Yb-doped fiber-based nanosecond pulsed laser regardless of the resin cement used.

show abstract

“…When polymerizing resin-based cements were applied, the fracture resistance of silica-based glass-ceramic crowns increased significantly [7]. Hence, this restorative materials require to be reinforced by adhesive cementation [7][8][9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Are self-adhesive resin cements a valid alternative to conventional resin cements? A laboratory study of the long-term bond strength

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to test whether or not the shear bond strengths of six self-adhesive resin cements to dentin and to glass-ceramic, 24h and long-term-aged, are similar to the one of a conventional resin cement. METHODS: Human molars (N=168, n=12 per group) and silicabased glass-ceramic specimens (N=168, n=12 per group) were embedded in acrylic resin and randomly divided into 28 groups. The following resin cements were luted according to the manufacturers' instructions: Clearfil SA (CSA), G-Cem (GCM), SmartCem2 (SMC), SpeedCEM (SPC), RelyX Unicem (RXU), RelyX Unicem2 (RXU2) and Panavia21 (control group, PAN). Shear bond strength was measured initially (24h of water storage 37°C) and after aging (24,000 thermal cycles, 5/55°C). The failure types (adhesive, and cohesive) were evaluated after debonding. The shear bond strength values were analyzed using three-way and one-way ANOVA, followed by a post hoc Scheffé and two-sample Student's t-tests. RESULTS: RXU, RXU2 and GCM showed similar after 24h and aged shear bond strength to dentin as the control group. CSA, SMC and SPC exhibited significantly lower values. Before aging, none of the bond strength values to glass-ceramic differed significantly from the other. After thermocycling, GCM showed higher results to glass-ceramic than CSA, SMC, RXU2 and the control group. Analyzing failure types after spontaneous debonding and shear bond test at dentin, solely adhesive failures were found, while at glass-ceramic only cohesive failures occurred. CONCLUSION: Not all self-adhesive resin cements can be a valid alternative to conventional resin cements in order to bond silica-based glass-ceramics to human dentin. Abstract (250 words)Objectives: The aim of the study was to test whether or not the shear bond strengths of six self-adhesive resin cements to dentin and to glass-ceramic, 24hours and long-termaged, are similar to the one of a conventional resin cement. Methods:Human molars (N=168, n=12 per group) and silica-based glass-ceramic specimens (N=168, n=12 per group) were embedded in acrylic resin and randomly divided into 28 groups. The following resin cements were luted according to the manufacturers' instructions: ClearfilRelyX Unicem2(RXU2) and Panavia21(control group, PAN). Shear bond strength was measured initially (24h of water storage 37°C) and after aging (24,000 thermal cycles,5/55°C). The failure types (adhesive, cohesive) were evaluated after debonding.The shear bond strength values were analysed using three-way and one-way ANOVA, followed by a post hoc Scheffé and two-sample Student's t-tests. Results:RXU, RXU2and GCM showed similar after 24hours and aged shear bond strength to dentin as the control group. CSA, SMC and SPC exhibited significantly lower values. Before aging, none of the bond strength values to glass-ceramic differed significantly from the other.After thermocycling, GCM showed higher results to glass-ceramic than CSA, SMC, RXU2 and the control group. Analyzing failure types after spontaneous debonding and shear bond...

show abstract

Resin-ceramic bonding: A review of the literature

Cited by 839 publications

References 78 publications

Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: Marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning

Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: Marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning

Effect of ultrashort pulsed laser on bond strength of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic to tooth surfaces

Are self-adhesive resin cements a valid alternative to conventional resin cements? A laboratory study of the long-term bond strength

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About