Resin-modified glass ionomer cement vs composite for orthodontic bonding: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial

Benson, Philip; Alexander-Abt, Jonathan; Cotter, Stephen; Dyer, Florence E.; Fenesha, Fatma; Patel, Anjli; Campbell, Ciara; Crowley, Niamh; Millett, Declan T

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.09.005

Cited by 24 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The results of the primary outcomes were previously reported and published. 13 Before and after OHRQoL data were successfully obtained from 110 participants (CPQ11-14-ISF-16 = 68; PIDAQ = 42) (Fig. 2).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The details of the primary outcomes including how and when they were assessed have been previously reported and published. 13 The primary outcomes were the presence or absence of new demineralized lesions (DLs), evaluated using the clinical photographic images obtained from before and after orthodontic treatment, and judgments about the esthetic appearance of any new demineralized lesions and the number of rst-time bond failures during treatment, taken from the clinical record.…”

Section: Outcomes and Any Changes After Trial Commencementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Details of the statistical methods and additional analyses used to compare groups for primary outcomes were previously published. 13 CPQ11-14-ISF-16 consists of three global questions, followed by 16 speci c impact questions in four subdomains. The response to the global questions was given using a 5point response format ranging from 'Excellent'=0 to 'Poor'=4 and from 'Not at all'=0 to 'Very much'.…”

Section: Statistical Analysis (Secondary Outcomes)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Longitudinal prospective evaluation of oral health-related quality of life in young patients undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment as part of a randomised trial

Elhussein¹,

Benson²

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The objectives of this study were to investigate relationships between change in the aesthetic appearance before and after orthodontic treatment and patient-reported change in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), and to assess the responsiveness of two OHRQoL measures to any changes from orthodontic treatment. Methods Two hundred and ten participants in a multicentre (two teaching hospitals and four specialist orthodontic practices), single blinded, randomised clinical trial with 2 parallel groups, were administered one of two age-specific questionnaires, either the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ11-14-ISF-16) or the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ), before and after orthodontic treatment. Clinical photographs were assessed by two groups of laypeople and orthodontists using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need Aesthetic Component (IOTN-AC). Results Two hundred and ten participants were randomised, and 197 completed the trial. Before and after OHRQoL data were successfully obtained from 110 participants. There was a mean reduction in the total CPQ11-14-ISF-16 scores of 3.9 (SD = 8.0), and a mean reduction of 34.2 (SD = 18.5) in the total PIDAQ score. CPQ11-14-ISF-16 demonstrated poor longitudinal construct validity (p = 0.155). Correlations between the change in total CPQ11-14-ISF-16 scores and change in IOTN-AC assessments were small for both orthodontists (r=-0.084; p = 0.516) and laypeople (r=-0.140; p = 0.225). There were higher associations between the improvement in the Social well-being (SWB) subdomain and improvement in IOTN-AC. Correlations between the changes in total PIDAQ scores and the IOTN-AC assessments, were higher in comparison to the correlations with CPQ11-14-ISF-16 (orthodontists; r = 0.223, laypeople; r = 0.025). There were no adverse effects. Conclusion CPQ11-14-ISF-16 and IOTN-AC measure different attributes. This demonstrated the role of SWB on children OHRQoL. Condition-specific measures (PIDAQ) are more responsive to change in self-reported OHRQoL than generic measures (CPQ11-14-ISF-16) after treatment. Trial Registration: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01925924.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Outcomes and Any Changes After Trial Commencementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Statistical Analysis (Secondary Outcomes)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Longitudinal prospective evaluation of oral health-related quality of life in young patients undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment as part of a randomised trial

Elhussein¹,

Benson²

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The longitudinal data were obtained before and 3 months after orthodontic treatment from 201 participants recruited to a multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial, involving two teaching hospitals and four specialist practices. 13 Participants were asked to complete one of two OHRQoL questionnaires. Participants aged 11 to 14 years were asked to complete the Short Form Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ11-14-ISF-16) before the placement of their orthodontic fixed appliance and 3 months after removal.…”

Section: Subjectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The details of the trial, including ethical approval, inclusion/exclusion criteria have been previously published. 13 Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Research Committee of the School of…”

Section: Ethicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Longitudinal prospective evaluation of oral health-related quality of life in young patients undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment

Elhussein

Benson

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The objectives of this study were to investigate relationships between change in the aesthetic appearance before and after orthodontic treatment and patient-reported change in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), and to assess the responsiveness of two OHRQoL measures to any changes from orthodontic treatment.Methods: Two hundred and one participants in a randomized clinical trial, involving two teaching hospitals and four specialist practices, were administered one of two age-specific questionnaires, either the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ11-14-ISF-16) or the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ), before and after orthodontic treatment. Clinical photographs were assessed by two groups of laypeople and orthodontists using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need Aesthetic Component (IOTN-AC).Results: There was a mean reduction in the total CPQ11-14-ISF-16 scores of 3.9 (SD=8.0), and a mean reduction of 34.2 (SD=18.5) in the total PIDAQ score. CPQ11-14-ISF-16 demonstrated poor longitudinal construct validity (p=0.155). Correlations between the change in total CPQ11-14-ISF-16 scores and change in IOTN-AC assessments was small for both orthodontists (r=-0.084; p=0.516) and laypeople (r=-0.140; p=0.225). There were higher associations between the improvement in the Social well-being (SWB) subdomain and improvement in IOTN-AC. Correlations between the changes in total PIDAQ scores and the IOTN-AC assessments, were higher in comparison to the correlations with CPQ11-14 (orthodontists; r=0.223, laypeople; r=0.025).Conclusion: CPQ11-14-ISF-16 and IOTN-AC measure different attributes. This demonstrated the role of SWB on children OHRQoL. Condition-specific measures (PIDAQ) are more responsive to change in self-reported OHRQoL than generic measures (CPQ11-14-ISF-16) after treatment.

show abstract

Fluorides for preventing early tooth decay (demineralised lesions) during fixed brace treatment

Benson

Parkin

Dyer

et al. 2019

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Resin-modified glass ionomer cement vs composite for orthodontic bonding: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial

Abstract: wrote the protocol, obtained ethics and other research approvals, recruited participants, collected, analysed and interpreted data and produced the initial report. Fatma Fenesha collated, analysed and interpreted the data and produced the initial report.

Cited by 24 publications

References 16 publications

Longitudinal prospective evaluation of oral health-related quality of life in young patients undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment as part of a randomised trial

Longitudinal prospective evaluation of oral health-related quality of life in young patients undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment as part of a randomised trial

Longitudinal prospective evaluation of oral health-related quality of life in young patients undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment

Fluorides for preventing early tooth decay (demineralised lesions) during fixed brace treatment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About