2021
DOI: 10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2021035089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance and Community-Building in Lgbtq+ Engineering Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite prevailing notions that queer spaces would give solace for my erasure in engineering (Yang, Boklage, et al, 2021;Yang, Sherard, et al, 2021b), all was not well in the land of the queers either. Instead, I encountered discourses of erasure under the dominant ideology of homonormativity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite prevailing notions that queer spaces would give solace for my erasure in engineering (Yang, Boklage, et al, 2021;Yang, Sherard, et al, 2021b), all was not well in the land of the queers either. Instead, I encountered discourses of erasure under the dominant ideology of homonormativity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That said, I purposefully began my short story in the cleanroom, a space where I did find fulfilment and joy from engineering, to highlight how marginalized students (including me) may find that engineering is an "overall positive" experience (Yang, Sherard, et al, 2021a, 2021b. While academic literature often perceives LGBTQ+ engineering students as having overly marginalizing, negative experiences in engineering, this dominant narrative may obscure resistance and joy (Yang, Sherard, et al, 2021b). In the short story, I cite several ways engineering fulfilled me: despite experiencing marginalization, I can look through the "necessary evils" toward my broader personal goals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, making changes, without putting (unpaid) burden on individual LGBTQIA+ people, can be difficult but is essential to improve academic climate and repair the pipeline for LGBTQIA+ people in STEM. This work can leverage and build on existing guidance and efforts (Ackerman et al, 2018;Atherton et al, 2016;BrckaLorenz et al, 2021;Butterfield et al, 2018;Cech et al, 2016;Cooper et al, 2020;Cross et al, 2020;Farrell et al, 2016;Farrell et al, 2018;Fisher, 2021;Freeman, 2020;Garvey, BrckaLorenz, et al, 2018;Guerra et al, 2016;Shane, 2022;Sinton et al, 2021;Unsay, 2020;Wallace & York, 2020;Wong, 2018;Yang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Next Participants Highlighted Institutional Trainings and Ed...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al state, "We define building community as the practice of creating spaces, fostering interpersonal networks and relationships, and uniting around an identity or cause that makes way for individual personal growth, group survival, and/or collective political action. These definitions of creating space and community-building operationalize specific techniques of resistance used by marginalized peoples to challenge dominant social and cultural forces that define an oppressive institution [27]." Gabe, found most of their social support in an Asian American student organization on campus and was able to be open about their non-binary identity with their friends.…”
Section: Finding Social Support Outside Of Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%