2014
DOI: 10.1590/s1982-56762014000400009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance in Capsicum spp. to anthracnose affected by different stages of fruit development during pre- and post-harvest

Abstract: This study aimed to investigate the reaction of unripe and ripe fruits of Capsicum spp. accessions to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides during the pre-and post-harvest periods, and to identify sources of resistance for use in plant breeding programs. Thirty-seven Capsicum spp. accessions of the Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro were evaluated. They were cultivated in a greenhouse and arranged in a completely randomized design with five replications. Twenty fruits from each accession were ino… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In Capsicum genus, resistance control depends on the plant organ under study, such as leaf or fruit (Mahasuk et al, 2009a). In the case of fruit, resistance may also vary with maturation stage, whether immature or mature (Silva et al, 2014;Sun et al, 2015;Suwor et al, 2015). In this study, we noticed that immature fruit was more susceptible to anthracnose than mature ones, which corroborates the hypothesis of different genetic control in these maturation stages.…”
Section: Exp12 -Resistance Assessment To Anthracnosesupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Capsicum genus, resistance control depends on the plant organ under study, such as leaf or fruit (Mahasuk et al, 2009a). In the case of fruit, resistance may also vary with maturation stage, whether immature or mature (Silva et al, 2014;Sun et al, 2015;Suwor et al, 2015). In this study, we noticed that immature fruit was more susceptible to anthracnose than mature ones, which corroborates the hypothesis of different genetic control in these maturation stages.…”
Section: Exp12 -Resistance Assessment To Anthracnosesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Evaluations were performed daily, at the same time, for seven days. Again, we made use of a scoring range, which was suggested by Montri et al (2009) and used by Silva et al (2014), thus determining the resistance levels on the seventh day of evaluation. Also, we calculated both incubation (IP) and latent (LP) periods of anthracnose infection, which correspond to the number of days between inoculation and the onset of symptoms, and between inoculation and the appearance of signs (acervulus formation), respectively.…”
Section: Exp12 -Resistance Assessment To Anthracnosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In leaves, the symptoms are not severe, besides being restricted, which may be advantageous for the selection of resistance at the early stage of development (Mahasuk et al, 2009b). In similar experiments, anthracnose resistance sources have been found in C. chinense in the seedling phase (Mahasuk et al, 2009a;Silva et al, 2014). This indicates that breeding of this species can be performed by selection or by genetic crosses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…We collected six unripe (35 days after anthesis [DAA]) and six ripe (50 DAA) fruits from each plant and disinfected them superficially in 1% (w/v) sodium hypochlorite solution for 5 min, followed by three washes with distilled water for 1 min (Silva et al, ). Five fruits from each accession and each fruit development stage were evaluated, and one fruit was used as control (mock inoculation with sterilized distilled water).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%