2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2010.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia to tumor necrosis factor−related apoptosis-inducing ligand-mediated apoptosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17,19,37 Cell surface expression of DR4 and DR5 was clearly detectable on all four t(17;19)-ALL cell lines except for HAL-O1, which showed marginal expression of DR4, whereas that of DcR1 and DcR2 was almost undetectable (Figure 2a). Strong correlations were observed between the sensitivity of a cell line to rhsTRAIL and its cell surface expression of DR4 (r ¼ 0.666, Po0.0001) and DR5 (r ¼ 0.539, P ¼ 0.0012) (Figure 2b and Supplemental Figure 2).…”
Section: Expression Of Trail Receptors On T(17;19)-all Cellsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…17,19,37 Cell surface expression of DR4 and DR5 was clearly detectable on all four t(17;19)-ALL cell lines except for HAL-O1, which showed marginal expression of DR4, whereas that of DcR1 and DcR2 was almost undetectable (Figure 2a). Strong correlations were observed between the sensitivity of a cell line to rhsTRAIL and its cell surface expression of DR4 (r ¼ 0.666, Po0.0001) and DR5 (r ¼ 0.539, P ¼ 0.0012) (Figure 2b and Supplemental Figure 2).…”
Section: Expression Of Trail Receptors On T(17;19)-all Cellsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Strong correlations were observed between the sensitivity of a cell line to rhsTRAIL and its cell surface expression of DR4 (r ¼ 0.666, Po0.0001) and DR5 (r ¼ 0.539, P ¼ 0.0012) (Figure 2b and Supplemental Figure 2). When compared with various B-precursor ALL cell lines (Figure 2c), the RFI of DR4 on t(17;19)-ALL cell lines (median 1.9) was significantly higher than that on MLL þ (median 1.0, P ¼ 0.0055), Ph1-positive (median 1.05, P ¼ 0.0330) 17 and other B-precursor ALL cell lines (median 1.0, P ¼ 0.0127) 37 by Mann-Whitney analysis. In addition, the RFI of DR5 was higher than 1.4 in all 4 t(17;19)-ALL cell lines, whereas it was p1.3 in 5 of 9 MLL þ , 2 of 6 Ph1-positive, and 8 of 13 other B-precursor ALL cell lines.…”
Section: Expression Of Trail Receptors On T(17;19)-all Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4). TRAIL-resistance of leukemia cells [6,35,37,38]. In this study we analyzed molecular mechanisms responsible for TRAILresistance of K562 cell line and the nature of TRAIL-sensitivity of two TRAIL-sensitive K562 clones (S1, S2) established by limiting-dilution approach from the original K562 cell line.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%