2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.09.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance to H+ induced irradiation damage in metallic glass Fe80Si7.43B12.57

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Helium bubble layers of metallic glass Fe 80 Si 7.43 B 12.57 and Zr 64 Cu 17.8 Ni 10.7 Al 7.5 were located approximately in the depth of the ion range. The largest helium bubble diameter of Fe-based metallic glass under the same fluence was approximately one fifth of that which we have found previously [36]. Research by Wang et al focused on a larger fluence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Helium bubble layers of metallic glass Fe 80 Si 7.43 B 12.57 and Zr 64 Cu 17.8 Ni 10.7 Al 7.5 were located approximately in the depth of the ion range. The largest helium bubble diameter of Fe-based metallic glass under the same fluence was approximately one fifth of that which we have found previously [36]. Research by Wang et al focused on a larger fluence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The damage and mobility that irradiation induces have many parallels with the effects of mechanical deformation. Metallic glasses appear to be immune from the unlimited void swelling observed in some crystalline alloys 118 , which suggests their suitability for nuclear applications 119,120 . Irradiation can induce relaxation or rejuvenation, depending on the initial state of the glass and on the irradiation conditions (BOX 2).…”
Section: Alternatives To Mechanical Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 In ref. [24], under the 250-keV H + irradiation of Fe80Si7.43B12.57 at the same fluence, different depths from the surface were kept in an amorphous state. The beam current with the energy of 40 keV (~5 mA) was found to be hundreds of times higher than the one with 250 keV (~10 A), and hence the damage cascade was more serious when the energy of the beam current was 40 keV.…”
Section: Effect Of Phase Structure With H + Irradiation In Metallic Gmentioning
confidence: 99%