Twenty-two commercially available endodontic posts were examined with regard to stiffness, elastic limit and resistance to fracture. Differences in mechanical properties w^ere explained by differences in width, shape and surface structure.In the selection of an endodontic post, its stability rather than its retention should be of primary clinical concern. Accordingly, the authors advocate the use of endodontic posts that have a cylindrical coronal portion and a conical apical portion.