The risks of bias inherent to observational studies are well known. There are a number of tools for evaluating risk of bias in this study design, most notably the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane non-randomized studies tool. 7 Chief among the potential biases, is a form of selection bias, indication bias, where participants are differentially chosen to receive an intervention because of predicted differences in prognosis. 7 Such bias results in the intervention appearing to lead to poorer outcomes-sicker patients typically receive more aggressive treatment. 8 Indication bias is notoriously difficult to adjust for and the direction of bias is usually toward worse outcomes among the treatment group. 8,9 As a result, this study is likely to have overestimated the negative impact of early dialysis initiation. There is also the potential for survivor bias, whereby children with a later dialysis start date are a healthier cohort because they have already demonstrated survival to that point. Another important limitation of this study is an inability to consider important factors specific to children, such as the impact of dialysis initiation on growth and development, given the limitations of the USRDS dataset. That the proportion of children starting dialysis with an eGFR.10 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 has more than doubled in the last 20 years is concerning given the absence of any benefit found in this study, and in the adult studies, including the IDEAL trial. 10 There appears to be no trade-off. The direct, immediate and incontrovertible deleterious financial, psychosocial, and physical impacts of dialysis are experienced on a daily basis by clinicians, children, and their families. 11 A recently published, independent analysis also using USRDS data reached similar conclusions to the Winnicki study. 10 Although more research is clearly needed to address this question, including prospective cohort studies with information on pediatric specific outcomes such as growth and development, until then the implications are clear. Time's up. Start dialysis later, except in the context of a trial. DISCLOSURES Dr. Craig was an investigator and author for the IDEAL study. Dr. Larkins has nothing to disclose. See related article, "Higher eGFR at Dialysis Initiation Is Not Associated with a Survival Benefit in Children," on pages 1505-1513.