2016
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance to root‐knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp. in woody plants

Abstract: Summary Root‐knot nematodes (RKNs) Meloidogyne spp. cause major damage to cultivated woody plants. Among them, Prunus, grapevine and coffee are the crops most infested by worldwide polyphagous species and species with a more limited distribution and/or narrower host range. The identification and characterization of natural sources of resistance are important steps to develop RKN control strategies. In woody crops, resistant rootstocks genetically different from the scion of agronomical interest may be engineer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(169 reference statements)
1
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Transmission electron microscopy has proved to be a valuable tool to visualize ultrastructural changes in GCs or cells in close vicinity to the nematode, typical of an hypersensitive response (HR) cell death phenotype, including cytoplasmic shrinkage, chromatin condensation, mitochondrial swelling, and chloroplast disruption combined with vacuolization (Coll et al, 2011). Transmission electron microscopy could verify that resistance in African rice to M. graminicola is characterized by HR or HR-like responses, as occurs in other plant species, including tomato (Bleve-Zacheo et al, 1982), coffee (Anthony et al, 2005;Albuquerque et al, 2010), grapevine (Anwar and McKenry, 2002), pepper (Bleve-Zacheo et al, 1998), resistant Ma plums (Saucet et al, 2016) and wild grasses (Balhadère and Evans, 1995). In these resistant species, the HR is usually efficient in stopping nematode development (Albuquerque et al, 2010;Bleve-Zacheo et al, 1982, 1998Khallouk et al, 2011) or is accompanied by poor development of nutrient feeding sites (Anthony et al, 2005;Fourie et al, 2013).…”
Section: Tog5681 Limits Nematode Penetration and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Transmission electron microscopy has proved to be a valuable tool to visualize ultrastructural changes in GCs or cells in close vicinity to the nematode, typical of an hypersensitive response (HR) cell death phenotype, including cytoplasmic shrinkage, chromatin condensation, mitochondrial swelling, and chloroplast disruption combined with vacuolization (Coll et al, 2011). Transmission electron microscopy could verify that resistance in African rice to M. graminicola is characterized by HR or HR-like responses, as occurs in other plant species, including tomato (Bleve-Zacheo et al, 1982), coffee (Anthony et al, 2005;Albuquerque et al, 2010), grapevine (Anwar and McKenry, 2002), pepper (Bleve-Zacheo et al, 1998), resistant Ma plums (Saucet et al, 2016) and wild grasses (Balhadère and Evans, 1995). In these resistant species, the HR is usually efficient in stopping nematode development (Albuquerque et al, 2010;Bleve-Zacheo et al, 1982, 1998Khallouk et al, 2011) or is accompanied by poor development of nutrient feeding sites (Anthony et al, 2005;Fourie et al, 2013).…”
Section: Tog5681 Limits Nematode Penetration and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Perennial plants such as the olive present a particular challenge for combating infection. Resistance genes are exposed to much longer periods of continual pressure than plants in annual production systems (Saucet et al 2016), increasing the risk that nematodes will 'break' the plant resistance (Lespinasse et al 2003). Nematicides are restricted in their use in woody plants and in a low-income crop such as olive are not economically feasible, thus alternative control measures are required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) are considered, among all plant-parasitic nematodes, to be the main agents that damage crops worldwide (SAUCET et al, 2016). In tropical climates, they are even more menacing, as the environmental conditions favor their development and reproduction (HUSSAIN et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%