1984
DOI: 10.1177/009770048401000305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance to the One-Child Family

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet overall, urban families are regarded by scholars as having made the "demographic shift" in which unlimited childbearing no longer improves chances for survival and upward mobility. In the countryside, by contrast, the one-child policy collided with the re-emergence of the household as a fundamental unit of production; the dismantling of rudimentary collective welfare guarantees; the emergence of peasant households wealthy enough to pay hefty fines for excess births; and a general weakening of state control over peasant mobility, income, activities, and its own local branches (Wasserstrom 1984;Potter 1985;Croll 1985c;Davin 1985;Davis-Friedmann 1985;Dalsimer and Nisonoff 1987;Greenhalgh 1990Greenhalgh , 1993Potter and Potter 1990; T. White 2003). Since virilocality continued to be the dominant marriage pattern through collectivization and decollectivization, farming families had immediate practical reasons to value sons over daughters, who would leave the family and the community at marriage (Robinson 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Yet overall, urban families are regarded by scholars as having made the "demographic shift" in which unlimited childbearing no longer improves chances for survival and upward mobility. In the countryside, by contrast, the one-child policy collided with the re-emergence of the household as a fundamental unit of production; the dismantling of rudimentary collective welfare guarantees; the emergence of peasant households wealthy enough to pay hefty fines for excess births; and a general weakening of state control over peasant mobility, income, activities, and its own local branches (Wasserstrom 1984;Potter 1985;Croll 1985c;Davin 1985;Davis-Friedmann 1985;Dalsimer and Nisonoff 1987;Greenhalgh 1990Greenhalgh , 1993Potter and Potter 1990; T. White 2003). Since virilocality continued to be the dominant marriage pattern through collectivization and decollectivization, farming families had immediate practical reasons to value sons over daughters, who would leave the family and the community at marriage (Robinson 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women fled their local areas to conceal pregnancies, and families as well as local officials underreported births (Banister 1987;Greenhalgh 1994; T. White 2003). Women were also subjected to spousal and family abuse for giving birth to girl children (Wasserstrom 1984;Croll 1985c;Tien 1985;Anagnost 1988;Honig and Hershatter 1988;Bianco and Hua 1988; Gilmartin 1990), leading to a belated but energetic state attempt to educate rural masses both about who carries the Y chromosome and about the legal rights of women and children (Wasserstrom 1984;Croll, Davin, and Kane 1985;Tien 1985;Anagnost 1988;Honig and Hershatter 1988;Croll 1994Croll , 1995.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations