2015
DOI: 10.1101/gad.256214.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance to therapy in BRCA2 mutant cells due to loss of the nucleosome remodeling factor CHD4

Abstract: Hereditary cancers derive from gene defects that often compromise DNA repair. Thus, BRCA-associated cancers are sensitive to DNA-damaging agents such as cisplatin. The efficacy of cisplatin is limited, however, by the development of resistance. One cisplatin resistance mechanism is restoration of homologous recombination (HR), which can result from BRCA reversion mutations. However, in BRCA2 mutant cancers, cisplatin resistance can occur independently of restored HR by a mechanism that remains unknown. Here we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
130
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in agreement with previous observations that the chromosomal instability of BRCA1/2-deficient cells can be reduced by inhibiting the nuclease activity of MRE11 or by preventing the recruitment of MRE11 to stalled forks by PARP1, CHD4, MLL3/4 and PTIP (Ding et al, 2016; Guillemette et al, 2015; Ray Chaudhuri et al, 2016; Schlacher et al, 2011; Schlacher et al, 2012). Our observations that WT, but not fork remodeling-defective, SMARCAL1 and ZRANB3 proteins cause replication stress-induced DSBs in BRCA1-deficient cells (Figure 6C–D) indicate that the remodeling of stalled forks by SMARCAL1 and ZRANB3 causes genomic instability in BRCA1-deficient cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These findings are in agreement with previous observations that the chromosomal instability of BRCA1/2-deficient cells can be reduced by inhibiting the nuclease activity of MRE11 or by preventing the recruitment of MRE11 to stalled forks by PARP1, CHD4, MLL3/4 and PTIP (Ding et al, 2016; Guillemette et al, 2015; Ray Chaudhuri et al, 2016; Schlacher et al, 2011; Schlacher et al, 2012). Our observations that WT, but not fork remodeling-defective, SMARCAL1 and ZRANB3 proteins cause replication stress-induced DSBs in BRCA1-deficient cells (Figure 6C–D) indicate that the remodeling of stalled forks by SMARCAL1 and ZRANB3 causes genomic instability in BRCA1-deficient cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…CHD4 (Guillemette et al, 2015), MRE11 (Ding et al, 2016; Schlacher et al, 2011), and EXO1 (Lemaç on et al, 2017) are factors that contribute to destabilizing the replication fork in BRCA2 mutant cells and are recruited/stabilized at the fork by PTIP (Ray Chaudhuri et al, 2016). It is worth noting that silencing PTIP causes resistance to olaparib and cisplatin in Kuramochi and OVSAHO cells at a scale comparable to the impact of miR-493-5p (Figure S4C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond their role in DSB repair via HRR, BRCA1 and BRCA2 occupy an important role in limiting access of nucleases (such as MRE11 ) to single-strand DNA at stalled replication forks, thereby leading to replication fork protection. Recently, loss of PTIP , CHD4 , and EZH2 have been identified as a mechanism of resistance in BRCA2 -deficient cells (Ding et al, 2016; Guillemette et al, 2015; Ray Chaudhuri et al, 2016; Rondinelli et al, 2017). Specifically, deficiency in PTIP and CHD4 impedes recruitment of MRE11 , thereby protecting stalled replication forks from nucleolytic degradation in BRCA2 mutant cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this scenario, nascent strand degradation is prevented by precluding the recruitment of MRE11 nuclease to stalled replication forks, which can be achieved by ablation of PTIP, MLL3/4, CHD4, and even PARP1 itself (Ding et al 2016, Guillemette et al 2015, Ray Chaudhuri et al 2016). Interestingly, HDR activity is not restored in these cases, indicating in the cell types tested that fork protection alone is sufficient to confer chemoresistance.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Resistance To Poly(adp-ribose) Polymerase Imentioning
confidence: 99%