2014
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-43662014000100015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistência específica à tração na operação de escarificação do solo em camadas de forma simultânea

Abstract: R E S U M OO aumento do tráfego de máquinas agrícolas maiores e mais robustas agrava a compactação do solo afetando, direta e indiretamente, a produtividade das culturas. Para solucionar este problema tem-se realizado a escarificação; contudo, esta operação apresenta elevada demanda de tração. Neste contexto e visando a uma operação de escarificação mais eficiente, desenvolveu-se e se avaliou uma ferramenta para o rompimento do solo em camadas, de forma simultânea. O experimento foi conduzido no Município de C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
1
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is indicative that this factor is not limiting for adequate disturbance in the furrow for no-tillage systems, thus suggesting the possibility of using speeds up to 2.78 m/s without reducing soil disturbance. These results are similar to those found by Bellé et al (2014) and Gassen et al (2014), while working with chisel plows in tillage systems, and by Francetto et al (2015), while analyzing the performance of associations between cutting discs and furrow openers. This effect may be associated with the friable soil consistency at the time of the experiment, confirming the results found by Casão Junior et al (2000), who observed no increase of the soil disturbance area only in this moisture condition.…”
Section: Maximum Furrow Depthsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is indicative that this factor is not limiting for adequate disturbance in the furrow for no-tillage systems, thus suggesting the possibility of using speeds up to 2.78 m/s without reducing soil disturbance. These results are similar to those found by Bellé et al (2014) and Gassen et al (2014), while working with chisel plows in tillage systems, and by Francetto et al (2015), while analyzing the performance of associations between cutting discs and furrow openers. This effect may be associated with the friable soil consistency at the time of the experiment, confirming the results found by Casão Junior et al (2000), who observed no increase of the soil disturbance area only in this moisture condition.…”
Section: Maximum Furrow Depthsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Cepik et al (2005), when evaluating the volume of soil disturbance by a row crop planter with five lines, fitted with hoe openers, according to the speed, found a mean value of 121.80 and 135.90 m³/ha, showing a 12% increase when sowing speed went from 1.25 m/s to 1.81 m/s. However, Bellé et al (2014) and Gassen et al (2014), when evaluating hoe openers for soil scarification, and Francetto et al (2015), when analyzing furrowers of planters, found no influence of increased speed on soil mobilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This indicates that this factor, similar to the distance, is not limiting for proper mobilization in the furrow for the direct planting system and suggests the possibility of using speeds of up to 2.78 m s -1 without causing changes in soil mobilization. These results are in accordance with those found by Silva et al (2012) when assessing the performance of straw cutting mechanisms, Bellé et al (2014) and Gassen et al (2014) when working with scarifiers in a direct planting system, and Francetto et al (2016) when analyzing the performance of furrow openers and cutting discs. This effect may have been influenced by the friable consistency of the soil at the time of the experiment, corroborating the results obtained by Casão Junior et al (2000), who did not find an increase in the mobilized soil area in this moisture condition only.…”
Section: Area Of Mobilized Soilsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Também, é verificado nos estudos de Bellé et al (2014) e Gassen et al (2014), ao avaliarem hastes para escarificação, onde a não influência do incremento da velocidade sobre a mobilização do solo, igualmente comprovado por Francetto et al (2016a) ao avaliar a mobilização de solo por sulcadores e discos de corte.…”
Section: Fatoresunclassified