Despite recent European advances in transgender rights, some legal systems have still handicaps related with obligatory diagnosis, sterilisation, and medical interventions, taking societal acceptance and public order into their discourse. This study dealing with the regime of legal gender recognition in Turkey first reveals critical reciprocating historical developments in national legal regulations on affirming trans identities. Then, the recent conditions determined by the 2017 Constitutional Court judgments that transgender people does not require any more permanent sterilisation but sex reassignment surgery for legal gender change are evaluated. Moreover, this paper exposes, whereas the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights has partly reflections on the current Turkish legislation, they are not a big step for transgender rights. The findings also underline that Turkish new regulations are reformist-looking but are indeed strong measures for legal consistency to solve the dilemma in the previous period in order to favor the status quo.